I'd rather be able to stand on my own two feet, and decide for myself what's worth sacrificing for.

then you are selfish.

Blanket-statement.

yes Mr.Binary, thats why i think the true act of selflessness, is setting people free, aka, teach them to survive on their own

its a binary choice

sacrifice or don't sacrifice

live or die

Disinterested: 1. not influenced by considerations of personal advantage. 2. having or feeling no interest in something.

and selflessness is pretty much understood

i.e. not selfish and not valued

If that's selfish by someone's strange, arbitrary definition, I don't really care all that much. I'd much rather help people out because I want to, not because I have to. And I _do_ want to help people.

it's an act performed on your own free will

so to continue to support people with your money by force is not Altruism

But you can't always _just_ be selfless, because then, you don't ever focus on yourself. And thus, you're in a worse position to sacrifice and help.

you arne't doing it because you choose to, you are doing it now because you are being forced to

Heres a new perspective for you

How is being a ball and chain to someone else an act of self-sacrifice?

in other words, how is being the beneficiary of an altruist person making you selfless? if anything it makes you selfish, for using another persons sacrifice

I do not choose to have my tax money go to welfare

they force that upon me

I would choose to have my taxes go to schools and healthcare

I think you are misunderstanding me here: as an Objectivist, I consider rationally pursuing values, i.e. selfishness to be a virtue.

not to support a family of 8 who refuse to work

It seems to be the difference between indifference and duty.
Indifference is a passive state, whereas duty is an active one, since the other definition is "a task or action that someone is required to perform."
Is that the same thing as a lack of motivation?

read this please: https://www.working-minds.com/galtmini.htm

that's why I said, ther eis a difference between helping and having that person rely on you to survive

I mean, in the end, you can't ever completely separate independance from all humans. Many have tried. All have failed in the end. It always goes south.

Robots don't make very good citizens

there is a distinct difference

Just ask communism

I'm not trying to make robots

but you are trying to imply that peopel are selfish for wanting to perpetuate the success of the human race

yes, because they are!

because they don't want peopel relying on them and they want to teach them to do thing for themselves

that makes no sense!

^

no they aren't at all

do you value the human race?

why would giving someone freedom over their own life be selfish?

if that were the case, cavemen would have died out a long time ago, had the man who invented fire never shared it

selfishness is about value

if you value something, you are selfish for pursuing it.

if he was the only one that knew how to do it, and he died, then the rest of them would have too because they didn't know how to do it