Message from @RyeNorth
Discord ID: 408513357671563264
'Chihuahua, Labrador, subspecies, and your point?
Do you deny subspeciation @RyeNorth?
They always put in some random link and then feed off the people who reply.
Yes.
I'm part irish, part british, part german...
I mean, if you want an opinion, you got it, but why bother if you are not going to listen to opposing views.
Then how do you explain dog breeds and human races?
Ayy, Irish represent.
Not saying that noone here is listening or anything.
I'm part otherkin part weeb part degenerate furry
Well... Even if different species of humans exist, do they physically distinct enough?
Oh yeah, that's absolutely right that race and breed aren't that far off from each other.
wanna know something that's going to sicken you?
And do we have enough info to know what aspects can be owed to certian features?
Mutts are generally more healthy than purebreds
Although I would argue the differences between human races aren't nearly as radical as those between dog breeds.
And well... We dont know which "purebreds" are actually pure.
There prity much the same thing there just different words to discribe the same thing in humans and dogs.
Rye I've already brought up dog Inbreeding to them
How to keep something pure genetically: incest
Not a race mate.
How to ensure something will be fucked up and die shortly after birth: several generations of incest
I mean it's all just genetics
Well, lets get back on topic
White is not a race either.
How is race, or breed, defined as anything other than a common ancestor?
You will form sub races naturally
Science has a small problem with your purity standards, it prefers diversity.
Like the polar bear white fur gene
Yes there are less dogs so it's harder to keep a bread going but there a millions of people different races. So there is enough genitic diversity in human races.
So then, how do we know if its a race, as opposed to a phenotype?
And at that, 'white' isn't a race, if race is the same as breeds.
I mean, Im not a geneticist
@Deleted User you can have a white person who is half black, but has white skin. Do you kick them out?
I think this is just getting caught up in terminology.
You, not being 'british' (or more likely, scottish) by being austrailian, is no different than my black friend not being 'african'.
Well, subjective definitions here.
No they just shouldn't bread.
Well, I want to catch up here
Yeah, but it's deterimental to the point where the actual ideas trying to be discussed are being lost in the noise, that's all.