Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 408527883909464064
oh, we're already there, Ginga.
Don't worry.
Yeah, but you're posting that with implication.
Also failed to add things like "college educated blacks"
No, a statistic of mine accounted for this. How much more do you think blacks vote for Republicans following them becoming educated or wealthy?
eeehhhh, there's that, maybe...
It's still overwhelmingly Democratic.
Too bad we cant see reasons for voting
Imagine how much more we can get out of it if we could read minds.
You can account for wealth difference, income difference, generation difference, regional differences, single parent household, dual-parent household, multi-generational. It's all overwhelmingly Democratic.
I mean more like, why they voted X.
Why do you thin they vote for the democrats?
If you don't see the importance of race is the equation, you're wilfully deluding yourself.
Here's my plight, and I ask that you let me get just a little conspiratorial for a second.
This is WHY every statistical organisation takes race so seriously as a determinant of voting patterns.
Not saying they are not important. Id just like to see why they vote X.
^ ^ ^ always ask why.
Do you really think the brain after tens of thousands of years of development did not change yet the length of our spinal cord, muscle mass, brain size, predisposition for twinning and facial features did?
If you think race is the only important statistic, you are deluding yourself.
It's for chiefly economic reasons. You can look it up yourself.
I never said it was. However, it is far more predictive than poverty or any statistic YOU can find.
I mean, there are people who vote something they disagree with cause they fear being left out.
Like being a repub in Cali
More importantly, you should consider how your enemies would use the same weapon you use.
I.E. racial monoliths
in fact
those very monoliths are probably what cement your own beliefs
Thing is we wont know that until we get mind reading tech
I wouldnt trust anyone with that tech now that I think about it...
But those very monoliths are what push the polarization.
Racial monoliths already exist. It's not people like me or ensure these polarisations proceed, it's natural human ingroup preference.
Humans are tribal by nature.
Race is not a social construct. I say this to clarify the next statement
Racial monoliths are a social construct
The very fact that we have black people who openly support Trump, and are called 'race traitors' for it
Wrong. If races have different capacities to succeed in a 21st century, service-based, highly industrialised economy they will naturally gravitate to the most effective means for their prosperity as a group.
In the case of blacks, it's primarily welfare.
What if/when we reach the point where individualism becomes an ideal, and may simply not be feasable for awhile, if we haven't already gotten there? I mean, I don't like identitarian politics, but if we're gonna have them, may as well have them for everyone. Whether or not the ideal is individualism, what if there are simply too many collectives at play?
You're correct that they gravitate towards welfare.
I think it's just to be expected that they work for their group interests. Think about it what animal that only work's for it's self would survive?