Have a look at what Lex posted in shitposting it explains it.

Well, also, large cities tend to be democratic, and even in the system of the electoral college a big enough city can determine how the entire state votes.

@Deleted User except it fails to account for economic status

Again, effects, not causes.

Well lets not get back to the bar you guys just brawled at

When you take only one variable and focus on it out of a larger equation, you are not seeing an accurate representation of the data

It's just showing how different demographics vote.

oh, we're already there, Ginga.

Don't worry.

Yeah, but you're posting that with implication.

Also failed to add things like "college educated blacks"

No, a statistic of mine accounted for this. How much more do you think blacks vote for Republicans following them becoming educated or wealthy?

eeehhhh, there's that, maybe...

It's still overwhelmingly Democratic.

Too bad we cant see reasons for voting

Imagine how much more we can get out of it if we could read minds.

You can account for wealth difference, income difference, generation difference, regional differences, single parent household, dual-parent household, multi-generational. It's all overwhelmingly Democratic.

I mean more like, why they voted X.

Why do you thin they vote for the democrats?

If you don't see the importance of race is the equation, you're wilfully deluding yourself.

Here's my plight, and I ask that you let me get just a little conspiratorial for a second.

This is WHY every statistical organisation takes race so seriously as a determinant of voting patterns.

Not saying they are not important. Id just like to see why they vote X.

^ ^ ^ always ask why.

Do you really think the brain after tens of thousands of years of development did not change yet the length of our spinal cord, muscle mass, brain size, predisposition for twinning and facial features did?

If you think race is the only important statistic, you are deluding yourself.

It's for chiefly economic reasons. You can look it up yourself.

It makes sense that they are doing it for their group.

I never said it was. However, it is far more predictive than poverty or any statistic YOU can find.

I mean, there are people who vote something they disagree with cause they fear being left out.

Like being a repub in Cali

More importantly, you should consider how your enemies would use the same weapon you use.

I.E. racial monoliths

in fact

those very monoliths are probably what cement your own beliefs

Thing is we wont know that until we get mind reading tech

I wouldnt trust anyone with that tech now that I think about it...

But those very monoliths are what push the polarization.

Racial monoliths already exist. It's not people like me or ensure these polarisations proceed, it's natural human ingroup preference.

Humans are tribal by nature.

Race is not a social construct. I say this to clarify the next statement