Message from @Somi
Discord ID: 451006471568621589
They just want to avoid any negative pr
Its less painful to ban few memers
Then have wsj on their ass
Also the murican liberal elite is half mad with paranoia that half their country is clearly fascist because Hilary lost
good luck @Timcast ❤ hope you're able to stream again on the main channel soon
...when YouTube employees a normy boomer that thinks hemp is dwugs
Oi mate you got a license for those lyrics?
wow man.... are replies to Tims twitter posts always so cancerous? https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1001307114596429824?s=20
Imagine if a black person was explaining something to a white person, because the white person clearly didn't understand what they were talking about, and the white person said "oh youre just blacksplaining" - its clearly language used to undermine whatever an <attribute group> says
so basically, youtube demonitizes channels... channels find sponsors.... youtube terminates channels for not giving them a cut of the sponsors... is that roughly whats up?
Seems like a logical conclusion.
"We have developed policies specifically to help tackle videos related to knife crime in the UK and are continuing to work constructively with experts on this issue."
but hey, at least they don't have guns
my grandfather gave up one of his guns
just a year or so back... the license fee went up
bearing got his channel back
https://youtu.be/1NT0E2CU31Y
"DEMAND TRAITOR TRUMPS IMPEACHMENT!
Replying to @Timcast
You had to dig really deep for this Rediculous statement didn't you ? I bet you could use a hug right about now . WTF grow up and grow a pair ."
there is something ironic with someone saying grow a pair with a name like that
"Grow a pair! You know! Like me who cannot accept that i lost"
im assuming Tims plan was to use this "mansplaining is hate speech" tweet to get them all out protecting and "making excuses for hate speech" when I dont think Tim even agrees hate speech is an offense (? could be wrong there?)
i'd say these are safe assumptions
That one's good for a laugh
i think the next step would be to find or come up with a good female base alternative to the term "mansplaining" as they seem to describe it. Which is basically men being condescending to women. Need to come up with women being condescending to men in areas where men will most likely have more personal experience in.
and ask if it is hatespeech
"BUT TIM! You can't be hateful against Men because power + prejuduce * word salad / Neo-Marxist REEEEEEEEEEE."
so theyre saying woman arent powerful
2.5bn people on this planet are reigned over by a over 90yr old woman
well ignore those, because that is a different argument in which it can't be hate speech against men
there are lot that are saying its not attacking the person but describing a behavior
which to me sounds more like a stereotype but hey
"We shouldn't dilute terms like this. It's not hate speech. Do you think any court in the US would agree with you? "
no us court would agree with hate speech period, but nice try this person
describing the behaviour would be saying "they explained something"
US does have hate speech laws.. but they are only when in connection to a violent crime
"No, these aren't hate speech. These are describing particular ways that men mistreat women. Holding people accountable when they demean others--ESPECIALLY when they have more social power--is not hate speech."
so jailing blacks for committing crimes is good then? Even if they might make up a disproportionate number of crimes committed. perfect, i agree.
they have hate crimes, not really speech
so like.. if you kill someone, its murder, if you kill someone because theyre white or whatever, its a hate crime
its not speech, its motive. they can use speech to try and prove motive to make it a hate crime, but its not the speech itself
true
same goes for trying to prove discrimination