If two people are married they have incentive to stay together. Separating has costs.

Marriage is essentially a proclamation that two lives are in essence one.

It's not a new concept

the children are more reason to stay together that marriage is

u cant kill ur kids but u can divorce

And it's not just a Christian concept

Unmarried people do not have these costs, a single bad fight can result in the end of the relationship as there is no major cost preventing one party from just exiting

if they do that then they are inmature

and shouldnt have a kid in the first place

a bad marriage is worse than a good divorce

for the children

marriage made more sense when "until death do us part" meant living until you were 50, and your kid was grown up at like 15.

since 3 kids with the same person would fill up most of that 50 years time frame.

Should children be taken from broken households and put into stewardship by that same logic?

“A bad marriage” which again, gays couldn’t have until a few years ago

tbh I consider homosexuality a mental illness

They couldn’t have the stability of that marriage

Re: same-sex couples producing kids - Didn't they find a way for lesbians to have biological offspring (with each other, that is) through some kind of off-brand cloning tech a while back? It's probably wicked expensive but I'm pretty sure I remember reading about it

oh pls no

It's evil.

2 men is bad but 2 women is worse

All of the lesbian offspring I know of have been through surrogate fathers

well i mean, i don't see why modern science can't find a way to fuck with producing haploid cells.

Where they just insert a sperm donation

to create basically an egg from a dude, or sperm from a female.

I can think of why they shouldn't

although for lesbians, they would only ever produce females

That is true

^

even if the kid has a penis

They wouldn't mind -_-

since guys carry xy, they could, with the right know-how, use the x to produce an egg. And then they would be getting sperm from the other partner which would still have a scatter shot of x and y. But for a lesbian, the sperm would only ever have x (as well as the eggs)

although, you could have a "lesbian" couple if one is trans

that doesn't require any medical breakthroughs

Did you just use sperm and scatter shot in the same explanation?

yes

-_-

I want off.

Daily reminder that you shouldnt bath with your sister

@RyeNorth you are welcome

if they figure out how to manufacture artificial y-chromosomes then two ladies could have a son