Message from @Grenade123

Discord ID: 453279197473931285


2018-06-04 19:24:41 UTC  

marriage made more sense when "until death do us part" meant living until you were 50, and your kid was grown up at like 15.

2018-06-04 19:25:05 UTC  

since 3 kids with the same person would fill up most of that 50 years time frame.

2018-06-04 19:25:09 UTC  

Should children be taken from broken households and put into stewardship by that same logic?

2018-06-04 19:25:10 UTC  

“A bad marriage” which again, gays couldn’t have until a few years ago

2018-06-04 19:25:14 UTC  

tbh I consider homosexuality a mental illness

2018-06-04 19:25:20 UTC  

They couldn’t have the stability of that marriage

2018-06-04 19:26:33 UTC  

Re: same-sex couples producing kids - Didn't they find a way for lesbians to have biological offspring (with each other, that is) through some kind of off-brand cloning tech a while back? It's probably wicked expensive but I'm pretty sure I remember reading about it

2018-06-04 19:26:55 UTC  

oh pls no

2018-06-04 19:27:00 UTC  

It's evil.

2018-06-04 19:27:04 UTC  

2 men is bad but 2 women is worse

2018-06-04 19:27:11 UTC  

All of the lesbian offspring I know of have been through surrogate fathers

2018-06-04 19:27:12 UTC  

well i mean, i don't see why modern science can't find a way to fuck with producing haploid cells.

2018-06-04 19:27:31 UTC  

Where they just insert a sperm donation

2018-06-04 19:27:44 UTC  

to create basically an egg from a dude, or sperm from a female.

2018-06-04 19:27:48 UTC  

I can think of why they shouldn't

2018-06-04 19:28:00 UTC  

although for lesbians, they would only ever produce females

2018-06-04 19:28:10 UTC  

That is true

2018-06-04 19:28:14 UTC  

^

2018-06-04 19:28:20 UTC  

even if the kid has a penis

2018-06-04 19:28:26 UTC  

They wouldn't mind -_-

2018-06-04 19:29:42 UTC  

since guys carry xy, they could, with the right know-how, use the x to produce an egg. And then they would be getting sperm from the other partner which would still have a scatter shot of x and y. But for a lesbian, the sperm would only ever have x (as well as the eggs)

2018-06-04 19:30:01 UTC  

although, you could have a "lesbian" couple if one is trans

2018-06-04 19:30:14 UTC  

that doesn't require any medical breakthroughs

2018-06-04 19:30:49 UTC  

Did you just use sperm and scatter shot in the same explanation?

2018-06-04 19:30:55 UTC  

yes

2018-06-04 19:31:08 UTC  

-_-

2018-06-04 19:31:23 UTC  

I want off.

2018-06-04 19:31:25 UTC  

Daily reminder that you shouldnt bath with your sister

2018-06-04 19:31:36 UTC  

@RyeNorth you are welcome

2018-06-04 19:31:37 UTC  

if they figure out how to manufacture artificial y-chromosomes then two ladies could have a son

2018-06-04 19:31:47 UTC  

true

2018-06-04 19:32:02 UTC  

I dont think you can consider it their son

2018-06-04 19:32:12 UTC  

would be more like a cyborg

2018-06-04 19:32:28 UTC  

the son of science

2018-06-04 19:32:32 UTC  

and lesbianism

2018-06-04 19:32:38 UTC  

or just nab a y from somewhere else and source the rest of the DNA from the mothers

2018-06-04 19:33:13 UTC  

of course, i'm sure some time in the distance future, you can order whatever kind of child you want from whatever partner you want. probably just walk up to a machine, insert your fingers so they can get some DNA, then pops out a fertilized egg you can either go the natural route with, or use the normal way with some kind of artificial womb that will be all the rage.

2018-06-04 19:33:35 UTC  

getting naturally pregnant will be laugthed at

2018-06-04 19:33:43 UTC  

and dangerous

2018-06-04 19:33:44 UTC  

like somethin primitive

2018-06-04 19:33:56 UTC  

you know how fucked up a baby can become going the natural way?