Message from @Grenade123
Discord ID: 453277935613509633
out side normal adoption
The study that deemed them worse was horseshit because it compared gay parents to intact straight parents which is inherently flawed when gay marriage isn’t legal thus gay households aren’t as stable
It depends on if they're trying to make political statements with their children.
why would gay couples be less stable because they cant marry?
Gay parents did just as well as unmarried straight households
that doesnt make sense to me
Because without the legal contract you are inherently less stable
if they are a good couple that can raise good children what does it matter if the govt lets them marry or not
I see your point but I dont think that is the reason why they perform worse at raising children
If two people are married they have incentive to stay together. Separating has costs.
Marriage is essentially a proclamation that two lives are in essence one.
It's not a new concept
the children are more reason to stay together that marriage is
u cant kill ur kids but u can divorce
And it's not just a Christian concept
Unmarried people do not have these costs, a single bad fight can result in the end of the relationship as there is no major cost preventing one party from just exiting
if they do that then they are inmature
and shouldnt have a kid in the first place
a bad marriage is worse than a good divorce
for the children
marriage made more sense when "until death do us part" meant living until you were 50, and your kid was grown up at like 15.
since 3 kids with the same person would fill up most of that 50 years time frame.
Should children be taken from broken households and put into stewardship by that same logic?
“A bad marriage” which again, gays couldn’t have until a few years ago
tbh I consider homosexuality a mental illness
They couldn’t have the stability of that marriage
Re: same-sex couples producing kids - Didn't they find a way for lesbians to have biological offspring (with each other, that is) through some kind of off-brand cloning tech a while back? It's probably wicked expensive but I'm pretty sure I remember reading about it
oh pls no
It's evil.
2 men is bad but 2 women is worse
All of the lesbian offspring I know of have been through surrogate fathers
well i mean, i don't see why modern science can't find a way to fuck with producing haploid cells.
Where they just insert a sperm donation
to create basically an egg from a dude, or sperm from a female.
I can think of why they shouldn't
although for lesbians, they would only ever produce females
That is true
^
even if the kid has a penis
They wouldn't mind -_-
since guys carry xy, they could, with the right know-how, use the x to produce an egg. And then they would be getting sperm from the other partner which would still have a scatter shot of x and y. But for a lesbian, the sperm would only ever have x (as well as the eggs)