the only reason would be just the benefits for having kids. and it would then be argued that they would never have a kid to qualify for them anyway

Because without a new generation populating the country the country weakens

exactly

However

Homosexual couples don’t produce children

and I assume they cant raise them very well either

even if they dopt

adopt*

They actually can

Homosexual couples are just as good at being parents as straight couples

I doubt that very much

technically homosexual couples can produce children. its just one parent would have to adopt the child, as it would most likely be mother/father by a surrogate

out side normal adoption

The study that deemed them worse was horseshit because it compared gay parents to intact straight parents which is inherently flawed when gay marriage isn’t legal thus gay households aren’t as stable

It depends on if they're trying to make political statements with their children.

why would gay couples be less stable because they cant marry?

Gay parents did just as well as unmarried straight households

that doesnt make sense to me

Because without the legal contract you are inherently less stable

if they are a good couple that can raise good children what does it matter if the govt lets them marry or not

I see your point but I dont think that is the reason why they perform worse at raising children

If two people are married they have incentive to stay together. Separating has costs.

Marriage is essentially a proclamation that two lives are in essence one.

It's not a new concept

the children are more reason to stay together that marriage is

u cant kill ur kids but u can divorce

And it's not just a Christian concept

Unmarried people do not have these costs, a single bad fight can result in the end of the relationship as there is no major cost preventing one party from just exiting

if they do that then they are inmature

and shouldnt have a kid in the first place

a bad marriage is worse than a good divorce

for the children

marriage made more sense when "until death do us part" meant living until you were 50, and your kid was grown up at like 15.

since 3 kids with the same person would fill up most of that 50 years time frame.

Should children be taken from broken households and put into stewardship by that same logic?

“A bad marriage” which again, gays couldn’t have until a few years ago

tbh I consider homosexuality a mental illness

They couldn’t have the stability of that marriage

Re: same-sex couples producing kids - Didn't they find a way for lesbians to have biological offspring (with each other, that is) through some kind of off-brand cloning tech a while back? It's probably wicked expensive but I'm pretty sure I remember reading about it

oh pls no

It's evil.