Message from @Atkins
Discord ID: 480060934333661184
I have heard of them rebuilding cites in secure locations for reconstructions.
If I were that judge I'd have a public hearing on releasing the names, invite media reps and get them to cover it. Then I'd be like "NO SOUP FOR YOU" and insult them for even trying.
Normally that is after a bomb goes off in a public area (Car Bombings)
you know, i could understand wants to know the names of jurors after a trail, particularly one which is highly controversial. Because it is possible that someone the same juror is ending up in a bunch of related cases. but not during.
and not publicly
what happened to investigative journalism, where you had to go out and ride the edge of the law to find whistleblowers and the like
oh man if I were a juror at a controversial trial i sure as hell wouldn't want my name to be public record.
Died when clickbait made more $$ for the most part
like the trayvon case
would you want your name attached to that?
you'd be legitimately in danger
Reuters still does good shit though, to the extent that they get in trouble for their reporting
CNN shows up at an old ladies house to intimidate her over supposed Russian made memes she shared in a Facebook group she runs.They put out her name, showed her house, and her face. This is why the fake news media is the enemy of the people. This isn’t journalism, it’s thuggery.
https://youtu.be/51XM0NpApcQ
If Manafort walks and it becomes public record that you voted for him to walk, you're almost certain to be targeted for harassment. Possibly even violence.
^^^^^
In crimial trials it is by secret vote, so if one person votes not guilty, then "Everyone" voted not guilty
The judge in this case knows the deal. He knows that Manafort is probably going to walk, or at best get off with time served and a small fine. And the judge has been shitting all over the prosecution since day one because he knows this is a political farce. I think this hearing could be the judge letting people embarrass themselves further.
reported cnn for mobbing.
Could be. He doesn’t seem to have a tolerance for bullshit
There's no way the judge is actually going to unseal anything, but he'll let the media make ridiculous partisan arguments and further degrade their credibility before shutting them down.
Good. Nobody should be bothering these people regardless of the outcome of the trail.
"Google staff tell bosses China censorship is 'moral and ethical' crisis"
https://theintercept.com/2018/08/16/google-china-crisis-staff-dragonfly/
"Google executives misled staff in meeting on China censorship. Here are 13 questions they must answer."
https://theintercept.com/2018/08/17/internal-meeting-reveals-how-google-bosses-misled-staff-on-their-china-censorship-plan-here-are-the-questions-they-must-answer/
Google's executive clearly don't mind censorship.
Today China. Tomorrow... censorship for the rest of us? Oh eh,...
at least there is some hope for the brainwashed staff
So it seems.
"Google censorship plan is 'not right' and 'stupid,' says former Google head of free expression"
https://theintercept.com/2018/08/10/google-censorship-plan-is-not-right-and-stupid-says-former-google-head-of-free-expression/
They had a head of free expression... until 2014.
What a job title “head of free expression” is
And what do you bet in 2014 they replaced the head of free expression with a head of diversity
Yes, but clearly they need someone with that title.
Well, it seems that Google executives themselves are already pushing diversity themselves.
I already found this worrying... https://twitter.com/susanwojcicki/status/890654400192028672?lang=en
now its time for youtube to ban tyt
that would be ironic
TYT have a history of trying to incite riots, so BAN THEM
TYT is a trusted partner though.
Shows you where these executives' heads are at.
They have argued that people should lose their right to vote because of their race and or gender
So they're racists.
And sexists.
And stupid
They lost me when they blatantly misrepresented Sam Harris' views.