and the fact that major corporations exploit the cheap labor which has lead to instance were these people are basically serf

But how about non violent offenders?

As a vet i will agree in some way they do get treated better but in most other not really

I think that is why we see so many people in the prison system. They lost hope outside, so they do stuff to get inside at times.

Because to them, it is better than being out on the streets.

is honestly a fair point there's a lot in the low ends of society that needs to be worked and nothing that will happen overnight

Teach them to fish, they eat for a lifetime. Give them a fish, they eat for a day. We need to have rehabilitation centers for jobs and work towards giving them more opportunities to better their life.

Well, at the same time, community trust for them isnt too great right now

You gonna need some govt initiative to get people to trust them, well just the non violent offenders

And to know the difference between dangerous offenders and non dangerous ones.

Just predictions. But Predictions that are believable. Headline says all.
https://quillette.com/2018/08/21/banning-bitcoin-to-complete-big-tech-censorship/

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DlKoHJRXgAA-IWh.jpg

who are these financial partners?

thats against the law

They feel comfortable enough to call their financial partners basically old farts yet don't feel comfortable enough to stand up to them? Sounds like bs to me

i think the email is bullshit

commenters to that article brings up an interesting point. blockchain is one giant paper trail.

bitchute is peer to peer

i thought bittorrent was the one behind that

http://amp.timeinc.net/thedrive/the-war-zone/23052/foreign-f-35-users-spend-millions-to-stop-jets-computer-from-sharing-their-secrets?source=dam

Google is gonna start getting this data at this rate

https://money.cnn.com/2018/08/21/technology/facebook-disinformation-iran-russia/index.html

"This influence operation linked to Iran aims to promote political narratives in line with Iranian interests, including anti-Saudi, anti-Israeli, and pro-Palestinian themes"

Hmmm, anti-israeli pro-palestinian? That's leftist positions isn't it?

generally, I believe so

Yup

Also right wing sometimes.

Depends on if they hate Jews or just want them to go "home".

I think it’s usually a combination.

Some ethno nationalist like Isreal. They can claim it's an ethno state and turn around and go "see? They have an ethno state! Why can't we?!"

Just that Israel isn’t an ethnostate.

They have to claim it is just so they can use it in that argument.

'ethno' is definitely not the word to use, given how many different ethnicities are there. But it's not really a theocracy either as the state wields no religious authority. It's just that it's a state with a specific state religion. Much like any number of Islamic countries.

But people love conflating ethnicity and religion.

Guys, stop poking holes in their arguments! they might get salty!

just let them pretend to be different from the left while using mirror logic.

they need to be coddled and told their world view isn't false

I mean.. israel has no issue with the descendents of palestein

Also, just because Israel says they are prioritizing one culture, that does not mean ethnostate.

clearly this is the solution

Like maybe america should say they prioritize true liberty for those who have earned it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/08/21/facebook-is-rating-trustworthiness-its-users-scale-zero-one/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6194f9a1a67f