yes, anchor babies were never meant to be a thing

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Suspect-Photos-Released-in-Brooklyn-Heights-Swastika-Attack--499517031.html

Hey did Tim do a video on the purge of Milo, Gavin and all other proud boys from Facebook?

For extra spiciness, we have legal precedent for the retroactive removal of improperly given citizenships.

Which means every 'anchor baby' in the nation can have their citizenship revoked and be deported.

It wasn't just prominent pages or public figures this time. I'm a nobody and they deleted my page

you must be too woke for FB

lol I guess, they just said it was because I was a proud boy

or rather am

Seems reasonable. Pride is one of the seven deadly sins, after all.

How dare you like Western culture. Who do you think you are?

Relevant western culture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YriinrRGug

man, the spice girls had some bangers

Old, but something to remember

Nancy Pelosi tells a story about her grandson wishing he wasn’t white. She was proud of her grandsons self hatred and said it was beautiful. This is the face of the Democratic Party. Anti white propaganda.
https://youtu.be/Dl3vPtDF7K4

#cantberacistagainstwhites

https://www.newsweek.com/conservatives-aim-bypass-congress-amend-constitution-1200369

"And even though amendments can originate in the states — a right granted in the second clause of Article V"

okay, i see no problem here

Seems mostly just facts if written a clear biad against the pres. Just saying "they are trying, here is what grants that right, and how it works."

the headline is technically accurate but can be taken several different ways

https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/sports/air-force-falcon-mascot-suffered-life-threatening-injuries-army-prank-232302183.html

Fucking west point brats. They are a fucking disgrace.

@Grenade123 What do they mean by "amend the Constitution"? Aren't conservatives supposed to keep things the way they are?

it's related to imposing term limits and possibly repealing another amendment. And it's an attempt to possibly reel in the federal government by preventing carerr politicians. Also it's a power granted in the Constitution

Oh. So it's to limit terms in Congress/House of Representatives?

Fine by me...

KRAZZ, you could look at it the other way. If they know they can't rely on the job and won't be able to be punished they are far more likely to make the most of having that power while they do. Back handers are a huge proplem and this could easliy make it worse.

What do we do?

It is the public that keep voting these people in.

It's not like they are resusing to leave.

we need to heavily invest in CRISPR and make sure trump lives forever. then, he can rule us like a monarchy

Put up a better candidate.

These ppl want power over everything else.

Losing that power is their greatest fear.

Expose corruption. The next person will be less likely to take a back hander.

What if you get in someone that really cares about the work and is good at it.

If the people want them why should they be fouced to leave?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46065766

Conservatives are supposed to hold to the laws of the constitution, as are all Americans, and there are provisions within the Constitution for revising it.

https://wcbs880.radio.com/articles/lawmakers-drafting-bill-would-allow-social-media-checks-gun-purchase

good thing i don't have any social media

“ News questions raised about Avenatti claims regarding Kavanaugh “ by Kate Snow and Anna Schecter on NBC

This article covers why Chuck Grassley referred Avenatti and Julie Swetnick to the Justice Department for criminal investigation. She has completely retracted the major claims of gang rape and the drugging of girls for rape. These claims were made in sworn statements. Swetnick is blaming Avenatti for twisting her words. Regardless, it was all lies.

http://archive.today/sEfmB