Message from @Ikea-Chan

Discord ID: 527299924157792282


2018-12-26 01:32:44 UTC  

With a light enough hand and the right propaganda, they could have kept the majority of the populace in line.

2018-12-26 01:33:33 UTC  

Germanys navy was small and they couldn't take losses.

2018-12-26 01:33:55 UTC  

Britains navy was the worlds greatest and could replace their boats.

2018-12-26 01:35:05 UTC  

Now Air Forces

2018-12-26 01:35:20 UTC  

The Luftwaffe could've "broken" the RAF for quite some time

2018-12-26 01:35:48 UTC  

But surrender would still not be.

2018-12-26 01:38:18 UTC  

germany had one chance to win .. .they fucked that chance up when they started WW2

2018-12-26 01:39:25 UTC  

also, re: RAF, only one group was nearly broken, group 11/12 IIRC , three or four other groups were not broken and could have reinforced the broken group. and we were outproducing the germans in aircraft in 42/43 time frame

2018-12-26 01:39:43 UTC  

so, just had to survive the battle of britain which from what I've read was not unlikely

2018-12-26 01:39:50 UTC  

and keep the SLOCs open

2018-12-26 01:40:16 UTC  

I'm not talking 42/43

2018-12-26 01:40:25 UTC  

I'm talking pre-barbarossa

2018-12-26 01:40:35 UTC  

meaning, '40 and '41 germany had no chance

2018-12-26 01:40:48 UTC  

and by '42, that chance had taken a jump to hyperspace

2018-12-26 01:40:55 UTC  

That is the highest chance they had at beating the British air force

2018-12-26 01:41:05 UTC  

and they didnt have that chance to begin with

2018-12-26 01:41:08 UTC  

And they wouldn't have "beat" it

2018-12-26 01:41:16 UTC  

yes, group 11 got clobbered badly

2018-12-26 01:41:23 UTC  

Only paralyzed it for a bit before it got back up ready for a fight

2018-12-26 01:41:24 UTC  

Even if Germany beat the RAF, it would be hard to invade the UK

2018-12-26 01:41:38 UTC  

That's what i was also saying Yathy

2018-12-26 01:41:39 UTC  

but there were other reserves that would have been able to have acted as reserves

2018-12-26 01:41:57 UTC  

Germany'd need a proper Navy for an invasion of Britain like Sealion

2018-12-26 01:42:12 UTC  

A navy which they did not have

2018-12-26 01:42:21 UTC  

sealion has been gamed so mnay times I suspect the scenario drives some people to tears, only a very very few times did sealion succeed

2018-12-26 01:42:35 UTC  

Sealion wouldn't succeed

2018-12-26 01:43:01 UTC  

It'd be sunk to the bottom of the English Channel.

2018-12-26 01:43:02 UTC  

sealion was absolutely mind blowingly stupid

2018-12-26 01:43:50 UTC  

There was of course the "sentiment" among some German high staff that the British would surrender

2018-12-26 01:43:53 UTC  

deliver more divisions to england than the allies did during the normandly landings, across a contested english channel with the RN at full strength, and only having life jackets for for the first wave.

2018-12-26 01:44:09 UTC  

and, using rhine barges

2018-12-26 01:44:09 UTC  

Rudolf Hess even went there personally, which was very idiotic

2018-12-26 01:44:12 UTC  

RHINE BARGES

2018-12-26 01:44:48 UTC  

I've seen modern rhine barges, their deck is so low to the river that a wake caused by a destroyer would have sunk the fucking t hings

2018-12-26 01:44:57 UTC  

rhine barges from the 40s?

2018-12-26 01:44:58 UTC  

Some people also say victory on the Eastern Front would've been possible.

2018-12-26 01:44:59 UTC  

deathtraps

2018-12-26 01:45:20 UTC  

What do you think about the "Victory on the Eastern front"?

2018-12-26 01:45:27 UTC  

9/10 sealion shortens the war for the allies and hastens the defeat of the germans

2018-12-26 01:45:53 UTC  

I think any scenario where the allies can aid russia ends in failure for the germans

2018-12-26 01:47:05 UTC  

germans penetrated to far too quickly in the initial assault, got bogged down by winter, then made an absolute monster of themselves by butchering so many that they were guarenteed their "internal lines" through occupied territories were contested