Message from @Bookworm
Discord ID: 527308534493347850
given its a 1960s tank
The Panzer I was supposed to be a training tank
not THAT Chieftain. The Moranes Guy
I believe the Panzer II was also supposed to be a training tank, very unsure
heh
I like him
No, Nikolas Moran
@Ikea-Chan every crap tank was suspose to be the training tank ... ok ? leave the cruiser tanks alone they were training tanks alright
Every crap tank wasn't a training tank
Look at Japan and Italy
ok ok so he's a fookin rebellious RoI bugger who went to the US
I still like him
I'll have to say the Germans were smart in using Czech tankses
They used them until they became obsolete
dammit out of limoncello
Then they made the Hetzer from them
What good reason was there to not implement the Pershing?
The Shermans were having tons of issues with subpar armor and penetration.
lack of numbers lack of improvement over what could be produced in far superior numbers and lack of logistic trains behind it
>lack of numbers
basically, if you listen to The Chieftan
**Centurion**
The chieftain
no, the pershing came in too late for it to be produced in decent numbers before being deployed
Dont watch him but I watch MHV and TIK
The Pershing was a good idea, you'll have to admit.
The American industry could make a lot of Shermans
But also make heavies that could rival the famous German tanks
So it was a good idea to begin the production of it
The Pershing came in too late *because it was deliberately shelved*.
Also, the Pershing did prove its worth in Korea
The design was ready to go by 42-43.
The Pershings out matched the Soviet T-34-85
the pershing was shelved because it was too late and could not be fielded in sufficient numbers WITH ITS LOGISTIC TRAIN to be of any significant improvement over what else could be produced
I'll have to say, the German TDs were quite scary
dunno, never met any
have you?
No, but in the perspective of WW2
dunno, not a historian, and wasnt in WW2, where you?