but the reason was very sound

Matilda 1 or 2?

eh, dont recall which one but I've not heard bad about the matilda as an infantry tank

2 then

possibly

The 2 saw most use I believe

IIRC even the soviets liked the matilda

Maus was best Tank in WW2 😛

And I am quite fond of the II, which most people just refer to as Matilda

@Stefan Payne Go away Wehraboo

ironic really since, germans, copied UK written doctrine on tank warfare

and their early tanks were, not very good

And didn't The Chieftain shit on the Sherman a bit??

The Matilda I is quite a forgotten tank

panzer III being ok

um, @Stefan Payne had the chieftan turned up in WW2

everyone would have shat their pants

given its a 1960s tank

The Panzer I was supposed to be a training tank

not THAT Chieftain. The Moranes Guy

I believe the Panzer II was also supposed to be a training tank, very unsure

heh

I like him

No, Nikolas Moran

@Ikea-Chan every crap tank was suspose to be the training tank ... ok ? leave the cruiser tanks alone they were training tanks alright

https://www.youtube.com/user/TheChieftainWoT

Every crap tank wasn't a training tank

Look at Japan and Italy

ok ok so he's a fookin rebellious RoI bugger who went to the US

I still like him

I'll have to say the Germans were smart in using Czech tankses

They used them until they became obsolete

dammit out of limoncello

Then they made the Hetzer from them

What good reason was there to not implement the Pershing?

The Shermans were having tons of issues with subpar armor and penetration.

lack of numbers lack of improvement over what could be produced in far superior numbers and lack of logistic trains behind it

Which would have been ameliorated if production wasn't shelved.

>lack of numbers

basically, if you listen to The Chieftan

**Centurion**