Message from @AnthonyLaCosaNostra
Discord ID: 471793648997105667
Antifa isn’t nearly as bad here. Probably because of that. They’re in the cites, but I’ve seen little violence from them. Could be because we’re all armed.
Concealed carry also implies drawing it when threatened (but only when threatened)
I wonder which result would be better
If republicans win big time that could make them more desperate and aggressive
@Deleted User Where are you? It's probably a more factor of local strength and the likelihood they'd get away with it.
If dems win big time that could encourage them
A number of ANTIFA have been getting away with beating people.
So maybe if its a draw would be best huh ?
I’d rather not say. @pratel nothing personal
Like, there've been all of 6 people who got any kind of punishment over the Inauguration protests.
And the vast majority just got released.
California has been remarkably lax on punishing them.
That's 'cause California believes they're on "the right side of history".
There was a case where the defense attorney was more or less a member of antifa and all but threatened the jury.
Unanimous acquittal.
I saw an Antifa push a woman here. A proud Boy punched him out in response. Can’t say I disapprove. But that’s all I’ve seen across multiple protests . As far as numbers, the local militia that show up outnumber Antifa 10/1
That's probably the deciding factor then.
People will usually act out as much as they believe they can get away with. Barring those who are entirely ideologically possessed. If the law was applied justly you'd probably see a lot less violence from people looking for trouble. Like 90s NY where crime took a nose dive from Police just fining people for petty crimes and being seen as active.
Antifa isn't dumb enough to get into fights they know they'll lose.
i think slander is only justifyable in business
But they'll extract anything they can when they are sufficiently strong.
I don't know if they would if they believed they'd suffer consequences. Like proper arrests.
The multiple stand down orders that officers appear to receive are what is real fishy for me.
So the diversity director or whatever her title is sent a email to our firm from Dr. Arin Reeves about Implicit Bias vs Explicit Choice in it it lists the examples of the white people calling the cops on the black peple ....
In case anyone is interested :
Tim has covered some of the stories listed in the email ^
How would she even know that stuff? @Rabbi Shekels
what do you mean ?
Well none of these are crimes , so why would the police even respond? @Rabbi Shekels are these from news stories or something?
well yeah the woman who called the cops on the california cookout , the white guy who called the popo on the black women who was in the community pool
i agree none of them are crimes
i'd call cops on black people too 😛
I don't recall police ever getting involved with the pool situation
nvm
i thought they did ? tim did cover it in one of his vids
was thinking of a different story
what im trying to say is that these issues aren't like a big deal but they are trying to say it's like a big deal and systemic etc
cuz they have to
they even fake reports