Message from @Beemann
Discord ID: 473921927795441689
already working on reshooting the footage
the idea is that next time i suffer a critical failure of someking, BSOD or power outage
i dont lose hours of footage
i got it down to 5 minutes.. but id prefer even less
(also tried recovery programs, all i could find, feeding it header and ender data from a non corrupt file, splitting and recombining the data, i mean there was multiple gigs of data there, but its all useless appearently, non recoverable)
i have literally the first 2 seconds and then it doesnt do anything no matter what i try
Excuse me just wanted to ask on a scale of 1-10 how open minded is this server when it comes to most topics?
9
tim doesnt like threats, even if jokes
although implying threats with the knife emoticon is allowed if you are a underage woman
It depends how you feel about vehement disagreement.
but tim might just have like her more then me lmao
@Mallic 8
oh ye, talk shit get shit is very much part of this
If telling you that the earth is round or that there are two genders triggers you, we're not very open minded.
issnt that right @Deleted User 🗡
there is only 1 gender
We are mostly open
There was even a nazi here
a literal one
which it is is impossible to predict, but lets not get into quantum feminism here
🗡
Then allow to ask for a second opinion. So I was debating with someone about the possibility of reincarnation right? I think it's true she thinks it's b.s. so I present evidence specifically Ian Stevenson reincarnation research and she says she wasn't convinced when I asked for her to give an alternate explanation she refused to do so yet she claims to have won the arguement
Is she right?
Not really
she didn't win
I don't think that's a winnable debate.
Yeah
well i mean is the debate over the positive statement that reincarnation exists?
The possibility yes
there's no physical, scientific, empirical evidence for reincarnation
becasue then the one making that positive statement has teh burden of proof
I'm afraid "You're wrong, i'm right" isn't an argument,
She can't win the debate, at best she just didn't lose it
it needs to be FALSEFIABLE
if the research you provided at least leaves the possibility it does
which is likely going to be the issue in that perticular debate
in a non deluded way
I honestly, don't see the point of research on reincarnation myself
I mean, I've 'lost' debates before where I was scientifically disproving biblical matters and the other person used their time to read the bible out loud. The topic was "Does God Exist"
false, unless the researcher found a way to falsefy his theory that spirits reincarnate into different bodies