!agree

Excuse me just wanted to ask on a scale of 1-10 how open minded is this server when it comes to most topics?

Then allow to ask for a second opinion. So I was debating with someone about the possibility of reincarnation right? I think it's true she thinks it's b.s. so I present evidence specifically Ian Stevenson reincarnation research and she says she wasn't convinced when I asked for her to give an alternate explanation she refused to do so yet she claims to have won the arguement

Is she right?

The possibility yes

Actual it has many people replicated his research and got similar results

Hold on

https://www.near-death.com/reincarnation/research/ian-stevenson.html

Here it's a lot to read though

I mean do humans work scientifically?

I hate that mindset if there is no explanation then it isn't real

That's so stupid

At the very least there is something going on that we don't know about

So why brush it aside?

Honestly it's either that or submit myself to moral nihilism

If I'm just gonna disappear into nothing then what's the point in anything?

Exactly

It would be fine if that was all it was but most atheists are naturalists

See this is the thing people seem to assume you need to believe in god for the supernatural

And that is not the cse

But then youbwould just label it as natureal

Honestly I will take any thing over just ceasing to exist

I mean isn't there some sort of unprovability theorum or something?

That's another thing that gets me why are soft sciences like psychology considered the same as pseudosciences?

Plenty considering it's harder to get empirical evidence regarding human behavior then it is for hard sciences like.physics

So.just five people a prescription drug and shove em.out the door

It's like giving people mainainance

Is it permanant?

Sometimes it just makes things worse

Sigh I really don't like such mechanical robotic approaches to science

Is this why certain circles hate rupert sheldrake so much?

That's not a treatment that's a fetish

The.problem is assuming that peep aren't biased in peer reviewa

Ok ok what i told you guys that panpsychism is becoming more and more academically credible?

Idk if Thomas nagal.is any indication there are plenty who don't want anything other then nautealism to be true

Sigh I think i made a mistake coming here...i forgot that however open minded this place is still slanted toward secular naturalism...so all that happened is that I wasted everyone's time sounding as far as they are concerned a complete idiot

Sorry

What's wrong with that?

......
...

Just answer me this

Am i wrong for believing we are more then just glorified squishy robots?

I mean am i wrong in thinking that we are onlybour physical bodies?

Or not

Not Just our physical bodies

I suppose