im just saying that the "i only believe things empyrically proven" thing is a lie

no its not 😮

how even perception is flawed just liek how emotions are

there are things you can not have seen the proof for, that you do use

because that proof does not yet exist

If you live a life to reduce the suffering of others, up until the day you find out what happens on the other side of death

Peace

What have you really lost?

im not saying you cant maximise this.. edict

proof of existance doesn't equal proof of outcome Cytos

I don't need to test my car to believe it will work next time i turn the keys around

@>Cytos, de lieve goede synth Dude, I do not need to understand how an engine works to accept that a car can turn on

how about a lamp

I mean isn't there some sort of unprovability theorum or something?

even then, five minutes on wikipedia

FIVE

well you do need to have an understanding to the point that you know how to turn a car on

you cant learn mechanics and physics and chemistry involved in a car in 5 minutes lmoa

You can learn how an engine operates

but even if you could

which is still an understanding hof how a car works, regardless of how low resolution and incomplete it is

🤔

the basic principles

you can actually

Just gotta know the concept of physics, chemistry and energy transferance

you cant do it for everything you do take for granted

but this actually relies on teh faith you have that it will work either way

there is too much proof, and not enough time

there also is not enough proof, in theory, for a being with infinite time

energy transference was explained to me in highschool as "Leprechauns with energy globes running through a track of wire"

Nah, most of them operate on the same principles

False equivalency, Cytos

I don't recall general becoming shitposting but then again I'm new here kek

That's another thing that gets me why are soft sciences like psychology considered the same as pseudosciences?

General is a wildcard

this issnt really shitposting tbh

@Mallic Literally who

They aren't, only portions of them are

You are lol

Unless you're talking about people who call JBP a pseudoscientist

which is hilarious

Plenty considering it's harder to get empirical evidence regarding human behavior then it is for hard sciences like.physics

@Vesdii there have been several cases where Shitposting was used as a news-page in the past, just roll with it