Message from @>Cytos, de lieve goede synth
Discord ID: 473927044695326761
you obviously never sat on a childrens plastic chair as an adult 😄
that the pragmatists looked to answer the problems that Kant brought up with both the reality of feels and reals
im just saying that the "i only believe things empyrically proven" thing is a lie
no its not 😮
how even perception is flawed just liek how emotions are
there are things you can not have seen the proof for, that you do use
because that proof does not yet exist
If you live a life to reduce the suffering of others, up until the day you find out what happens on the other side of death
Peace
What have you really lost?
im not saying you cant maximise this.. edict
proof of existance doesn't equal proof of outcome Cytos
I don't need to test my car to believe it will work next time i turn the keys around
@>Cytos, de lieve goede synth Dude, I do not need to understand how an engine works to accept that a car can turn on
how about a lamp
I mean isn't there some sort of unprovability theorum or something?
even then, five minutes on wikipedia
FIVE
well you do need to have an understanding to the point that you know how to turn a car on
you cant learn mechanics and physics and chemistry involved in a car in 5 minutes lmoa
You can learn how an engine operates
which is still an understanding hof how a car works, regardless of how low resolution and incomplete it is
🤔
the basic principles
you can actually
Just gotta know the concept of physics, chemistry and energy transferance
you cant do it for everything you do take for granted
but this actually relies on teh faith you have that it will work either way
there is too much proof, and not enough time
there also is not enough proof, in theory, for a being with infinite time
energy transference was explained to me in highschool as "Leprechauns with energy globes running through a track of wire"
Nah, most of them operate on the same principles
False equivalency, Cytos
I don't recall general becoming shitposting but then again I'm new here kek
That's another thing that gets me why are soft sciences like psychology considered the same as pseudosciences?
General is a wildcard
this issnt really shitposting tbh
@Mallic Literally who
They aren't, only portions of them are
You are lol
Unless you're talking about people who call JBP a pseudoscientist
which is hilarious