Message from @Beemann
Discord ID: 473936617552347158
I want you to take a gun to a range and fire 10 shots with 0 spread in your groupings. Just use physics m8
If you can't do it, it's not a science
on the contrary, if you can't do it, you can set it as a basis for science that it can't be done (barring the infinite numbers argument)
the term "random" is jsut the coloquial term for stochasticy
which in essence means randomness but not as randomness is colloquially understood
You can't fire 10 shots on target exactly in a vacuum using a machine because you couldnt do it IRL in your meat body?
meat machines on mars
Sigh I think i made a mistake coming here...i forgot that however open minded this place is still slanted toward secular naturalism...so all that happened is that I wasted everyone's time sounding as far as they are concerned a complete idiot
Sorry
oof
you can do it on target in a vacuum in zero g
(true zero g)
you want a complete spread of all beliefs for you to want to be somewhere?
thats gay
secular naturalism
What's wrong with that?
you will never get that
I didn't realize I was a secular naturalist
nah i think its a "you don't agree with me so i'm leaving" thing Cytos
Right and that doesn't change the fact that you're only going to get a % success rate in a real world scenario
......
...
I mean, you're absolutely welcome here if you want to stay.
The fact that you're calling evidence a form of bias doesn't reflect well tbh
Like we can discuss how that study isn't proof at all
I can find middle ground
thats so PoMo
I am a naturalist for the most part
ieuw
@Ghostler hi sargon
But if you're just going to label and disregard there's no point
Just answer me this
I'm secular in the sense that I want state and church to be separated but I'm not anti-religious at all
42
Not even the muzzies
#noteven
Am i wrong for believing we are more then just glorified squishy robots?
@Ghostler agree seperation of state and religion
No.
Depends on what you mean by that statement
you're not right or wrong