Message from @Rabbi Shekels
Discord ID: 476355043453566980
Irony is for the birds.
"it would be better for us to go down with Bolshevism than live in eternal slavery under capitalism."
Lol heres a funny fact about Goebbels
Joseph Goebbels (1897-1945) was a rather different kind of Nazi. A journalist and writer...
Anyone seeing Jim Acosta gonna be the next Goebbels? 😉
telling you, most of these people are projecting
they know what the practice is evil but they don't want to be evil, so they project themselves onto their opposition in an effort to destroy that bad part of them. but it never works, because they don't focus on the root of problem which is internal. Instead they waste all their time smashing mirrors reflecting their ugly self and call themselves pretty
You can't be bad, if theres no one left around you to say how bad you are
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLNhPMQnWu4
John Cleese explains it best
Love that video.
Annoys me that John Cleese was with the rest of the leftists in reaction to the election of Trump.
It's like c'mon dude.
C'mon.
Theres the sjw propaganda machine
Theme of that image: https://youtu.be/BJFUCyR2KKk?t=7m29s
Matches up well lol
This works also.
Konami produced some good New York Times themes.
@Dr.Wol going to watch that video after this one :
Remember guys the constitution doesn’t apply to private corporations ...Seriously wtf is wrong with people
depends on what it says really
Well...it doesn't. But if there's a private corporation(s) that has a monopoly/oligopoly that could potentially infringe on your rights and take you out of public life then I think the government does have a mandate to intervene in order to protect your rights
Agreed
That's the point of the government, it exists to protect your rights
The problem is a lot of these corporations don't count as monopolies yet
So the government won't pursue them
They have no laws against oligopolies
I don't know if anti-trust laws would apply in something like the Alex Jones situation because it sure looks like collusion
anti-trust wouldn't
cuz its not the opposing youtube channels that get Alex Jones banned,
So they're not "removing competition"
and youtube/fb/twitter is removing their own "profit" thing by removing Alex Jones
not sure if its laws being broken, but its foul play
looks like i have a senator to vote out of office
factoid, an old tweet but probably still accurate... https://twitter.com/qikipedia/status/901972606223515648?s=20
These days I think they correct more than 2% of their mistakes, but they're shadow edits and somehow they get more things wrong in the process
Or they just dont mention it.
you could try reaching out to QI for the source material on that tweet, but its an old tweet and I think they go through quite a lot of researchers, they may not even remember which researcher brought it up
oliver darcy said social giants only took actiona gainst jonesa fter weeks of media pressure