Message from @wacka
Discord ID: 476379181349994527
I don't know if anti-trust laws would apply in something like the Alex Jones situation because it sure looks like collusion
anti-trust wouldn't
cuz its not the opposing youtube channels that get Alex Jones banned,
So they're not "removing competition"
and youtube/fb/twitter is removing their own "profit" thing by removing Alex Jones
not sure if its laws being broken, but its foul play
looks like i have a senator to vote out of office
factoid, an old tweet but probably still accurate... https://twitter.com/qikipedia/status/901972606223515648?s=20
These days I think they correct more than 2% of their mistakes, but they're shadow edits and somehow they get more things wrong in the process
Or they just dont mention it.
you could try reaching out to QI for the source material on that tweet, but its an old tweet and I think they go through quite a lot of researchers, they may not even remember which researcher brought it up
oliver darcy said social giants only took actiona gainst jonesa fter weeks of media pressure
but the pressure was about fake news
now they are going "oh its not about fake news, its about hate speech"
And then we go back to the slippery slope of who gets to define "hate speech". There really is no good way to portray this.
You mean if corporations control everything we can ban speech and guns and privacy? WTF I love corporations now!
Remember the good ol' days when leftists hated corporations?
what other emotions could we make illegal?
anger speech? i think that would lead to more violence
love speech? arent more murders portrayed in the home or whatever?
happy speech? might make some people jealous and offend them?
hate speech... oh yeah we already got that one...
what other human emotions could we ban?
:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>
:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Patreon (exclusive rewards available):
<https://www.patreon.com/timcast>
isn't a government official calling for all internet companies to ban a person for their speech a near direct violation of the first amendment?
How has 'fake news' only become a term in like the last 2 years.
they look like letter boxes and bank robbers....BLASPHEMY!
wearing something that is all black and only has small cut-outs for the eyes..... yeah, he is totally wrong saying they look like bank robbers
Oh shit thats a good idea , go into a bank with a hijab and rob a bank
You dont even get to rob the bank and they ask you to remove the hijab , then sue the bank legally and you get free monies claim they infringed on your religious liberties
lol
“Legally” robbing the bank
There was one time when they banned masks at sport events in UK.
So some hooligans went in hijabs
Lmao lulz
How do you think Hitler would feel about his name being a mating call of Nazis who didn't realize they were acting more like Nazis than Neo Nazis?
Kitler would be livid
XD finnally got internet back at my place lol fucking cable