Aren't people activly trying to change the words being used?

They are changing it to change it. To gewt you to say what they want you top.

It doesn;t matter what they get you to say just as long as they get you to say it.

yeaaa... so because there are unreasonable demnad to change language you gonna oppose one that's perfectly respectable because..scoring against opponent or what ?

One small change they say , then they keep makin those small changes fuck them

No, I'm not objecting for the sake of it. I can name reasons why it should not be changed. If all you have for it to be changed is that it doesn't matter if it is, then I win.

And it's another attempt to control language

i have one reason for it: it sounds better 😛

I'm not saying it doesn't matter. I'm saying it's actually superior term

@I AM ERROR it sounds more PC

Subjective, don't count.

yea you can say that to anything that's not hard science

nah, it sounds more in line with how every one else is doing it

great argument

No it is not a surperior term. It contains less information.

it contains more information

no it doesn't

I'm calling it now, the USA will die, and what will come from the ashes will be terrifying.

man =/= player

could be the coach

eh

A coach can't be man of the match

He isn't playing on the field

I feel like tim almost said cnn is fake news in his new vid lmao

he participates in the match

Yes and so do the little kids getting the footballs for the players, Let's just give random strangers man of the match title lol

'man of the match' A man that played the best. Must of been playing in the mans league. 'Player of the match' Human that played the best.

why not? the name of it does not specify that it has to be a player

@I AM ERROR Go choke on a donkey dick.

wtf? autoplay after tims video goes to a russian video from 2014 for me <:TimThink:482277772497125378>

There was a crew of masonry workers doing the facade of a building I walk by on a daily basis. They had a sign saying "Caution: Men at work". Someone used a sharpie to cross out "Men" and replaced it with "People". The crew was all men, and according to the US Census somewhere between 98.5 and 99% of such work is done by men (depending on whether you consider them masons or slaters).

THAT is actually stupid, atkins.

Were there any non-human workers?

The important question right here ^^

Obviously you have to do "Open Original" to read that but it shows that female masons are like albino unicorns.

Becouse thats kinda the only reason i can see to say "people" instead of "men"

Men is gender neutral and allways has been

If you want to indicate sex, it goes with a prefix

(or if you want to indicate anything other than adult human for that matter)

If its female, its wo-man. Males dont get to have a gender identity so we dropped the male prefix...