I'm a pro indian

I condemn that

Ola is typing

Thanks for thanking me

May god bless your balls🍒

@ola

They themselves are gods

@Ola, mind your balls while talking to me

I stopped doing

That's a cunning fox🦊

I don't trust it

You @drenath ?

I like victims

I hate @kaizen

I hate reddit

You @drenath ?

@pete say something

https://qr.ae/pN4fTl

Answer on the existence of God

Good one read it

https://www.quora.com/Do-you-believe-in-the-existence-of-a-god/answer/Bhukya-Mohan-Rathode?ch=10&share=94f74a8e&srid=hxojP

It's the same link dude

Snippets from the answer

@kaizen is a cool dude

@m.miller you read that answer ?

Thanks dude

Yesterday I was drunk, sorry for those messages on group

It wasn't me, it's the alcohol made me do that

I'll never

Sorry dude

I'm being honest

What I personally think is "consciousness" is
the ocean and i'm a fish swimming in it. The water
is all around me, the medium i move thru. but
the water is flowing in my gills "inside" me all
through me as well.. the ocean is all one. yet i
feel what flows through me as distinct.

Consciousness can't be separated, there isn't such thing as your consciousness and my consciousness .

> Well it’s 11:30 and my brain is exhausted so I’m still trying to comprehend your words haha so bare with me
@kaizen
Man its plain simple dude

> You know you’re made up of millions of atoms, but still act like once being even though you know a certain fact
@kaizen
Man we should have a holistic way of looking at things. We can't separate them try to make sense Outta it

> You know you’re made up of millions of atoms, but still act like once being even though you know a certain fact
@kaizen
The problem with most people reasoning is that we fragment things on a number of levels

> I don't think so. Some of us were in book club earlier.
> If you want a debate you could always try suggesting a few topics, see if anyone is looking for a fight ;)
@ola I'm always up for a debate

> Are you on the west coast?
@StoneCold316 Hey stone cold where are you from?

> We don't ask stone that
@Killian I'm sorry

@Killian Hey Killian where are you from?

> Arizona
@Killian I like Arizona

> I like rain
@Killian I like thunder

> So lightning must be a close second?
@Killian Of sorts

I like loving others

> Elaborate
@Killian I can't, due to terminological limitations

> Elaborate
@Killian I hate elaborating

Where is @StoneCold316 ?

I love his messages

> You liking to love others without context is creepy to me because you cannot convey tone over text
@Killian Loving for a reason is a limited love, and when the reason you love someone disappears your love also disappears

> There’s no such thing as unconditional love - except self love maybe.
@StoneCold316 for that I would love to hear your definition of love

> If we’re talking about human love, my threshold is really high.
@StoneCold316 I know it's just a chemical reaction taking place in the Brain, we ourselves is a chemical soup so let's not get into that chemistry. Rather we see things without fragmenting them then would be able to look at the holistic nature of things

Cool

> @Malachi I think there's an important distinction between wishing for someone's death and observing that someone's death has positive consequences (but preferring that those positive effects come about in some other way). And if someone is doing something sufficiently bad, and *their death is the only way to stop it*, I think it would actually be wrong **not** to want their death.
>
> To take an extreme example (not trying to argue that Trump meets this standard), if killing Hitler were the only way to stop the holocaust, then I think it would be wrong to not want him to die - based on the way I set up the hypothetical situation, not wanting Hitler's death is implicitly equivalent to wanting the holocaust to continue, since those things are inextricably linked. So I don't think someone can categorically say that it's always wrong to wish for someone's death.
@Katelyn I disagree

Lemme exaplain you

There has always been hatred towards Jews even before Hitler

Hitler is someone who has organised that hatred in such a way that it resulted in those mass killing a

If it wasn't for Hitler someone competent like Hitler would have done it

> Note that in the way I set up my hypothetical, Hitler dying would guarantee that the holocaust would stop. I'm not saying that's necessarily true - I'm using a thought experiment to elucidate some of the underlying theoretical moral principles.
@Katelyn see we have to identify the root cause for the problem, Hitler lived a life on the belief which has been down to him from his elders that Jews are parasites

He acted on those false beliefs

So does terrorists

But by killing Hitler you would kill someone competent enough to execute and organize the killings, if not Hitler some other competent with those beliefs would have taken his position

> Let's say that there's some evil dictator named Bitler who was responsible for the horrible torture and death of millions of people. We happened to have the information that if we killed Bitler, then this horrible tortue and killing would stop. Would it be wrong to want to kill Bitler, assuming killing Bitler were the only way to stop him?
@Katelyn
People just don't kill other people for fun, and if they really do then they are a psychotic mental ailments

Well in that case we have medications

But in most cases people act on their fallacious beliefs

All I'm saying is that killing is not the only option, cuz we have to observe what actually led them to do so. In Hitler's case it's the long bred hatred towards Jews handed down to him from his elders

> I agree that B(H)itler did what he did because of his delusions, but those can very hard to talk people out of once they're committed to the path of large scale genocide.
@Katelyn
Here B(hitler ) has a commanility with lot many people around him. And he gained mass support cuz they all share something in common. ( Hatred towards Jews).
If it's not for the commanility Hitler himself wouldn't have accounted for that genocide.

He rose to power using those common grounds

If Hitler said something like Jews are good guys that's against the will of their people he share space with and he would have never achieved what he would have achieved

What he achieved***

That's why I'm saying he just organised that hatred which was there into killing machines.

> That's why I'm saying he just organised that hatred which was there into killing machines.
@Homeschool dropout which was already there into****

> @Homeschool dropout Yes and no I think. Sure, B(hilter) was reflective of larger scale probelms, but they also can actively add fuel to the fire. To switch to a more straightforward example with Trump (not saying he's like Hitler), Trump is the biggest source of misinformation about covid (this has been shown empirically, I can provide the study if you want). This misinformation has caused people to take it less seriously. He also actively encouraged states to open too early (can provide empirical evidence for this too), and has started a moronic culture war about masks, which is the one major thing we know to be helping prevent the spread. If we had literally anyone else as president right now, say, Bush, Obama, Romney, etc., we would not have misinformation spreading this much. Sure, there's always going to be idiots and people wanting to make up conspiracies, but it would be significantly attenuated if it weren't the POTUS saying these things and actively undermining health experts in his own administration. So in this case, it seems like Trump is largely creating this situation which probably wouldn't have happened under the any other administration.
>
> I'm not saying Trump and Hitler are anywhere near the same, but I'm much more familiar with the situation with Trump than I am with Hitler. And I think it's not unreasonable to extrapolate that orgnized hatred is a lot more dangerous than unorganized hatred, and removing that organizing figure could make it considerably harder for them to get a foothold and act on their hatred.
@Katelyn

Darling, I would never turn to a politician for health related queries.
That's why we have Doctors.
Politicians are experts in politics and doctors good at assessing our health.

We have to be cautious about where we are getting our information from

> Right, but then why is Trump saying these things? You can say folks shouldn't trust him all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that a lot of people do, and they're getting really bad information that is causing them to make bad decisions. If Trump wasn't contradicting his own public health experts, those people probably wouldn't be believing falsehoods that Trump is making up.
@Katelyn
Well I don't know much about Trump for that matter, but I'm sure he didn't climb up the ladder himself to become president. It's you people who cast your valuable votes.
I would never vote with such a temperament

i would never vote a guy with such temperament***

What's the media doing when Trumps spreading all that misinformation?

Aren't they educating people on Covid?

Anyway, people will only believe what they want to believe until they are hardly struck with something that contradicts them

Who would put their trust on a politician for health related issues??

Only a moron

Are you one of them?

I would be glad if you aren't

Wanna join VC?