Virulence
Discord ID: 408418936862933012
71 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1
Hello
Good, just finished reading Ride the Tiger by Julius Evola
How are you? @koolguy18000
Yeah, if youโre interested in esoteric fascism, give it a read
Same, and I could say the same about books critiquing capitalism
Sure, but it still is utter trash
Much, much better alternatives exist
Capitalism is antithetical to honest social conservatism
Any traditional social order is a limit to the process of commodification, to profit, and to the capitalistic growth imperative, so it is obvious that any sort of traditions would be culturally constructed as barriers in an expression of capitalism in its late stages. The relegation of our fundamental values to the private world results in the death of the meaning which they hold.
It has led to the perversion of Conservatism into an impotent ideology that is basically the preservation of the โtraditionalโ form of liberal values and individualism.
Even communism hasnโt destroyed conservatism as much as capitalism has, and thatโs saying something
Capitalism does not at all value independence; whatever market self-sufficiency that values subsidiarity and can persist on a local level among communities has long been replaced in most of the West. This is because capitalism is founded on the notion of endless growth.๏ฟผ
Some free markets can exist outside of the realm of liberalism and capitalism... However, many things simply canโt be left to the โinvisible handโ if you want them to function properly.
For instance, socially conservative values
Why is that a bad thing?
You donโt have to start with Evola btw
There are plenty of other places a beginner could, and frankly should start at
I agree, but thatโs not the case for everything, particularly social conservatism.
Are you a social conservative? @Free2Think
I havenโt advocated socialism, you are straw manning
Completely free markets, as in, you donโt believe in any government intervention?
Free markets ultimately lead to the formation of a hierarchy based on economic achievement, a โmeritocracyโ as you may call it. This does not guarantee that people with socially conservative morals are in charge of society, which is why a totally free market is an untenable form of social organization.
What โwins outโ in the free market, if it isnโt controlled sufficiently, is what has ideological hegemony, what controls the opinion-making sectors of society.
Besides, the commodification of culture and the distraction of the populace through the propagation of materialistic attitudes is a problem for holistic social worldviews like conservatism. Capitalism seeks to homogenize the world into consumer units where you purchase your identity and everything becomes commodified. Only notions of higher meaning that cannot be satisfied by an economy of desire and fake, individualistic needs are deemed to be these barriers.
@koolguy18000 my guy Iโm not advocating socialism
The liberal notion of democratic freedom, coupled with industrialization, prevails to such an extent that we end up identifying with the ideology of the State, which is predicated upon the concepts of consumerism, homogeneity, and the destruction of transcendent value. Understand that weโre living under a tyranny unlike socialism, but rather one where the lines between the private and public sector are being blurred and corporations control the culture.
@koolguy18000 how is that relevant
Bruh are you listening to what Iโm even saying
Is that so? Then why wonโt you provide some counter arguments to dismantle my โliesโ?
Or are you to unprepared to engage in discourse about the future of conservatism because you just want to distract yourself with whatever Charlie Kirk tells you to.
I am not a democrat, I am not a socialist, I am not a progressive, I am not a liberal. I am a social conservative, nothing else.
When have you ever heard a democrat say the things I have said? Democrats are even more conditioned into the system than mainstream republicans
I agree that they are, but thereโs no reason as to why you should expect that that will happen if you fight alongside movements like TP USA
Since the election fraud, how many events has TP USA had?
Other than the one that Charlie Kirk drove to 15 minutes away from his house
Are they standing up for Trump? For conservative values?
But they wonโt, they only are doing what they must to gain more donors and votes for the GOP establishment.
But the establishment republicans wonโt do that
They are literally coming out and showing their true colors
That doesnโt make me hopeful, it saddens me that some apologist for homosexuals and person who condemns any legitimate conservatism like Kirk is going to be responsible for conditioning the future of conservatism
China is bad, but the great majority of our problems that have arisen internally in our country: feminism, consumerism, anti-traditionalism, anti-Christianity, secularism, sex-positivism, rampant individualism, etc.
And socialism has emerged from the consequences of those internal threats, which conservatives failed to attack after WWII
But donโt you understand that you wonโt accomplish this if you continue to let the establishment republicans run the show? Trump is anti-establishment, but heโll only get us so far as far as social issues go assuming that he gets into power (which is, unfortunately, very unlikely)
At least support the America First movement created by Nick Fuentes, itโs the last hope for the USA
Thatโs a good mindset
Look up Nick Fuentes and Keith Woods on YouTube
And if you get there, read some good books
I recommend How to be a Conservative by Roger Scruton
Yes we are
Also check out Morgothโs Review and Blackpilled on YouTube
Always glad to help
!rank
What are yโallโs thoughts on Israel?
I urge when you get the chance to pass the Stop Internet Sexual Exploitation act. This is simultaneously a matter of public safety to protect children from exploitation and to protect the nationโs crumbling moral fiber. This Bill is a must pass and I urge you to do so. @here
This is a standard message you can email to your congressman/senator
Hereโs, for instance, a senator thats easy to contact https://www.tillis.senate.gov/services/forms/30B84400-E0C8-4C4E-83B7-25C4BBF1E84C/email-me
Itโs 100% worth it
Not the purpose of the bill lol
It mainly would just regulate much of it out of existence
Sure, it certainly wonโt get rid of it entirely. However, if we try hard enough, we could still make a huge difference
I mean, taking down whatever amount of non-cp would be worth getting rid of a large amount of exploitative content. Besides, most of the regulations imposed wouldnโt be a 70 year old man being hired to detect this stuff. Most of it would be regulations and guidelines targeting content creation imposed by the websites themselves, not on already produced content.
Lol that screams strawman, nobody said that thatโs what will happen
Lol ok
I donโt give a damn how those degenerates react, I give a damn about a difference being made
Iโm not sure what youโre specifically referring to as far as statistics go... yes, there has been a decrease in rapes over the years as access to pornography increased. However, the question of whether porn access can have positive or negative influences on the desire for one to sexually assault someone depends on many different factors that change for every individual (correlation =/= causation). I also must say that correlation between the two is very low if not non existent, and studies that were published on the matter could only arrive at conclusions through great generalizations. The decrease in rape could very much be happening less frequently primarily because women feel safer/confident speaking out. A compelling case could made for the contrary, that pornography can pervert the perception of women that men can have and be more prone to objectifying and sexually assaulting them.
I mean, I personally have thought about this for quite some time, which lead me to arrive at my current position. But if you are referring to another dilemma that banning porn could cause, please specify which one.
If weโre still on the first topic, then certainly, assuming that access to pornography were to be significantly decreased and rape rose, other measures could be taken to decrease this.
Putting women in the position to speak out about their experiences has been proven to make a difference
Alright, I have to go anyway
Good convo
1. Carp Fisher
2. 17
3. Esoteric Fascism
4. I hate faggots, trannies, and the like
5. PNJโs yt channel
6. No
71 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1