Message from @Virulence
Discord ID: 792439869711712277
I urge when you get the chance to pass the Stop Internet Sexual Exploitation act. This is simultaneously a matter of public safety to protect children from exploitation and to protect the nation’s crumbling moral fiber. This Bill is a must pass and I urge you to do so. @here
This is a standard message you can email to your congressman/senator
Here’s, for instance, a senator thats easy to contact https://www.tillis.senate.gov/services/forms/30B84400-E0C8-4C4E-83B7-25C4BBF1E84C/email-me
On the outside this makes sense but also no longer keeps anyones privacy... Catch 22
It’s 100% worth it
I guess you would know everyone's info for every porn video watched. Good luck passing that
Not the purpose of the bill lol
It mainly would just regulate much of it out of existence
I 💯 agree with keeping kids away from it ALL, but people are more likely to use pornhubs facebook share button long before registering there information to watch porn. As I said, catch 22
Sure, it certainly won’t get rid of it entirely. However, if we try hard enough, we could still make a huge difference
GG @Virulence, you just advanced to level 4!
And keep in mind, folks like youtube have used these laws to harm others in pure spite... Now every video must be uploaded and specifically submitted not for children or your ass is in deep shit... That part, I am okay with, where I have my problem is where they purposely twist and manipulate. Youtube has on purpose edited videos to be for kids and the uploaders get jnto serious trouble. Mostly all due to people who don't know there head drom there ass... Not every video game video is for kids just because it's a video game. If you can't tell the difference, you have no damn purpose being a moderator
These back doors and loop holes are always used on purpose. Always some deniability. Oh, the moderator was 70 years old and didn't know... Why was the 70 year old hired to moderate game footage in the first place...
I mean, taking down whatever amount of non-cp would be worth getting rid of a large amount of exploitative content. Besides, most of the regulations imposed wouldn’t be a 70 year old man being hired to detect this stuff. Most of it would be regulations and guidelines targeting content creation imposed by the websites themselves, not on already produced content.
And in this particular case... We'll hire some harcore catholic whom believes breathing the wrong way is a sin and ends up red flagging and screwing up the entire process just to keep from employment discrimination laws from being broken. I don't wanna argue, but you know darn well there's always 1 in the crowed screwing everything up for everyone else turning a good thing into a total nightmare. It happens with everything everywhere
Lol that screams strawman, nobody said that that’s what will happen
No, it just happens
Lol ok
I think this is good, but I also know how people and the people who make porn will react
Though I will NEVER EVER condone CP in any way... Porn cannot be heavily regulated. If it has ANY good purpose, it lowers the r@pe rate. Statistically proven, mr weird in head is less likely to go violate a woman if he already got his rocks off. Perhaps a vulgar description but it's fact
Now, make a discussion discrediting that fact...
Before implementing new laws, seriously think about everything around it
Personality, I believe violating a woman is no different than CP. Neither has any place in this world
And we have more r@pists than child molesters. Extreme catch 22
I’m not sure what you’re specifically referring to as far as statistics go... yes, there has been a decrease in rapes over the years as access to pornography increased. However, the question of whether porn access can have positive or negative influences on the desire for one to sexually assault someone depends on many different factors that change for every individual (correlation =/= causation). I also must say that correlation between the two is very low if not non existent, and studies that were published on the matter could only arrive at conclusions through great generalizations. The decrease in rape could very much be happening less frequently primarily because women feel safer/confident speaking out. A compelling case could made for the contrary, that pornography can pervert the perception of women that men can have and be more prone to objectifying and sexually assaulting them.
I'm in agreement, but you have to seriously think everything thru to the fullest.
I mean, I personally have thought about this for quite some time, which lead me to arrive at my current position. But if you are referring to another dilemma that banning porn could cause, please specify which one.
If we’re still on the first topic, then certainly, assuming that access to pornography were to be significantly decreased and rape rose, other measures could be taken to decrease this.
I'm gonna end this discussion due to there being no winner, your points are just as valid as mine. And I cannot argue with a catch 22
Putting women in the position to speak out about their experiences has been proven to make a difference
Alright, I have to go anyway
Good convo
Tomorrow 🍿 for everyone, Here we go 🇺🇸<:trump:786404250061766656>
I’m a little disappointed, Trump wound up signing the original package. Redlined certain items and is suggesting congress change it BUT he signed the original bill so suggestions is all he can do. The $900B/600 per US citizen (1800 per illegal immigrant) bill is the one that is now official
🙏 @Free2Think Maybe President Trump want we to avoid another government shutdown and he has a plan, he always does but the swamp needs to be resisted against still
@koolguy18000 @Free2Think Merry Christmas and happy new year!
My thoughts are that if the Government is shut down, you won't have a vote on Jan 6th
@Lloyd Owen There you are! Happy Holidays to you!