.agree

So I have to write about Germany and their history for my exam. How do I write about the Germans being cucked to their history without actually writing that?

lol, I actually know what I would write, but we're being restricted in what sources we can bring in... so essentially I can't argue that

@Fitzydog How in the world is there a connection between the two of those?

Fair

Depends, did you pay for coffee?

!rank

lol, I'm from Cuckada (or whatever we're calling it now), I'd love to escape to another country

Probably not necessary, it doesn't seem like he has any supporters left. And I'm a UNI student, if they were anywhere they'd be there

I mean Canada's hate speech laws are better than the UKs right now, so maybe not

At least as far as I can tell

Everyone hates the Quebecois xD

I live about 6 blocks away from the bridge from Ottawa into Quebec. Can confirm ^

Well I would hope so

My uni started a beginners Hungarian course this year, I took German instead

Honestly if they run it over the summer I'm tempted

Easier than Mongol

French is mandatory, I took French and German back to back in the same semester

09:30-11:30 was German, 11:30-13:00 was French

They aren't as similar as you'd think for being neighbours

It really isn't that difficult imo, you just need to get past English

^ yes

Above average for a female I think ^

FUUUUUCK

Yea, only 1720mm

I'm like 0.5" shorter than that

That's why I wear combat boots, 1" heels on those bad boys 👌

Also seeing over crowds privilege ^

Are you rich?

Tru

Apparently Peterson is 6'1" https://www.reddit.com/r/JordanPeterson/comments/6ol8x9/anyone_know_how_tall_jordan_is/

Napoleon syndrome confirmed

Tbh, I forgot this was his server

Not to a normal person

I bet you'd break your fist trying

*race realism increases*

I wonder if all that is cultural imperialism by the West, or appropriation by Japan?

Here in Ottawa we got nice weather for the first time yesterday

@Trebjonn One time we weren't allowed to leave the house because of cold, it was too cold to snow but if you went outside you pretty much got frostbite instantly

@DanielKO Internalised oppression at its finest

!rank

What did he say? My audio isn't great

lol

lol, I just lurk on Dank's server

It's so much worse

Kill me xD @Deleted User at least it's got a separate channel so we can avoid it

Oh good.

I just started it

>Is a liberal arts major

> Much regret

@ethan For sure

This is my good boy ❤

Golden retriever/poodle

"If you do not win your case, there is usually a right to apply for the decision of the court to be reviewed by a higher court and possibly be quashed. Such a right, however, is not automatic. There must be proper grounds for making an appeal and there are strict time limits within which to do so. There must be substantial procedural or other irregularity which will give rise to appeal. The aim of an appeal is to correct a wrong decision and so avoid a miscarriage of justice.

An appeal must be allowed by a court. It is therefore necessary to prove that there was some kind of misunderstanding of the law, evidence or facts. Sometimes one of the parties obtains fresh evidence; this is not normally allowed by an appeal court, but if the party can show that this fresh evidence was relevant and credible but not possible to be obtained for the hearing at a lower court, it will be allowed."
https://www.inbrief.co.uk/court-judgements/right-to-appeal/

As far as taking away right to appeal, I can't find anything regarding that. So someone actually from the UK would have to address that

You have to prove some sort of wrongdoing it would seem

Which in Dank's case would mean the appeals judge would need to see what the judge did as wrongdoing

More info here as well: https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/the-judiciary-the-government-and-the-constitution/jud-acc-ind/right-2-appeal/

I think you have the automatic right to submit an appeal, but the actual hearing needs to be approved. Which is fair I'd say

I'm not sure. I would think so but I don't know if that kind of footage is public access

That comes out a lot in the comments of articles too, lots of people saying "he's a cretin but I disagree with the ruling"

Morning

The problem really *is* the vagueness of this law -.-
Comms Act 2003
SS127 (1):(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or
(b)causes any such message or matter to be so sent.

If you were to google it you could probably find an english translation

Same way as if I were to say Доброе утро

(Dobraye ootro) Good morning

Where did you get that screenshot from @M4Gunner

Aye true, although you mean the Latin Alphabet and not the Romanised Alphabet *

Until you remember that the *east* is also West of us

indeed

lol, not so far if you look from the North Pole

Ah, I was looking for who said what he was quoting @M4Gunner and it's the Crown Prosecution Service

*weast*

I think people not getting the joke is what gets them offended

*paid for by Portland Equity in Action*

Excellent

I think part of understanding a joke is understanding that it is a joke, and I really don't think if you understand something is a joke you can be offended. You can find it un-funny sure, but not offensive.

^ Worked in a Steel Mill, can confirm

I'll keep an eye out for signs when I walk around town later, we must have a group like that in Ottawa

Good point, found them:

If it's above his roof, isn't it on his property? Property rights usually extend into the air a little ways

Also sorry to throw this into the conversation randomly, but I was looking at different Parliaments... look at Hungary's

Harassment of buildings is a big problem, it's even worse than our rampant Nazi Pug problem. Frankly, it's out of hand

!rank

That goes for most people ^

I can respect that

The latter *is* much worse imo

It's fine to be wrong, so long as you're prepared to change your view if someone brings up a valid argument counter to yours. That's the point of open debate/discussion

I changed the way I do research for my papers, so they take like 5x longer now, but I find my arguments are far more well informed

And confirm them with another if possible

No way in hell

I love sitting out on the balcony at night and listening to the crazies walk by

@Baraban I'm just jumping in so I may have missed this, but could you elaborate in what ways the Left is necessarily more authoritarian?

I'm not sure I can argue against that, so I'll have to concede the point.

You also don't have to register a firearm if it doesn't reach certain specifications in Canada, ie. my Slavia 618 rifle isn't powerful enough to need to be registered

Who's the bastard that ended their donation in an uneven number

Soon as I get a job I'm throwing some money in