MinecraftMemer
Discord ID: 281214291259031564
381 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/4
| Next
The moon is flat. The government doesn't have enough money to fund a 3D model. That's why we only see 1 side at a time.
I am a genius.
There is no such thing as Islam, it is a social construct, therefore ISIL is a social construct
A communist post is a true shitpost
Being gay is a choice
Being a gender is a choice
Being white is a choice
Therefore, there is no such thing such as homophobia, sexism or racism because it is a choice
Can I get serious please?
Thankss
No shit, now the question will be how favored are Democrats in the house
Republicans are almost certainly gping to keep the Senate
Neither party is gonna get 60%
Nobody is getting 60%
Republicans would have to flip 9 states, and that's just not going to happen
Republicans would have to flip Montana, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, West Virginia, Florida and Virginia. That is almost certainly not going to happen.
Republicans aren't going to flip Florida though
They are even less likely to flip Michigan
Honestly, Republicans should consolidate on Montana, North Dakota, Indiana and West Virginia, defend Nevada and Arizona, and focus on the House.
So is Texas?
Lmao
@๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ adorable doggo
Texas won't flip lmao
Dems won't go for Texas in 20+ yeard
We need Arabs moving to America, they know how to respect women
Yes it is
Why are we expecting that parties will always have the same alignments in 10 years
Trump already showed the Midwest can vote red.
I mean the Rust Belt can vote red
Brown people don't have to vote blue
Muslims have much more culturally similar to Mormons than hippies
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3644217/Ian-Smith-has-sadly-been-proved-right.html
What do you think of Rhodesia/Zimbabwe?
What if you took an alternate view. Instead of seeing it as black rule and white rule, look at it as capitalist rule and Marxist rule?
Because logically, wouldn't the economic decline be based off of economic reasons?
Hence, wouldn't the economic problems be better viewed as capitalism vs. Marxism rather than white vs. black?
I don't understand.
I don't see how poor people destroy a country.
Unless you are using redistribution, poor people at worst do nothing.
But they don't go out of their way to harm the economy.
And how do they harm it?
By existing?
But welfare and aid are because governments and cultures CHOOSE to pursue welfare and aid.
Those are leftist economic choices, not intrinsic to the poor.
If we do nothing, they won't harm the economy.
They'll just remain poor.
So the issue isn't welfare?
So then why have welfare in the first place?
So you're suggesting elections are the problems?
If welfare is intrinsic to democracies, then it would be logical to have a different style of government.
In that case, we would have monarchies.
I would say quite the opposite.
Monarchies are probably the MOST concerned for the long term welfare of citizens.
Why not a permanent monarch?
Have you ever read Hans-Hermann Hoppe?
Hereditary rule is precisely why monarchies is so effective and efficient.
It encourages monarchs (unlike democrats, who only worry about elections) to invest in the future of the country.
Hereditary rule is the only insurance that rulers will care about the future.
And in that case, they would have their nation (i.e. property) lose value.
And we would be dominated by smart, competent leaders.
But the idea behind them, that nations are private property for an single individual, is much better than democracies.
Dictators are not concerned about the nation after they die like hereditary monarchs are.
Is there a solid incentive like hereditary monarchies?
North Korea is a de facto hereditary monarchy.
The only reason it is weak is because of communist, rather than capitalist economic policies.
Is focusing on foreign affairs intrinsic to monarchy, or is that just a trend?
I'm confused.
And why is that?
Why can't they expand their powers like, say, the Finnish or Danish did, through industrialization and modernization?
Also, why is this intrinsic to monarchies and not dictatorships?
Why do monarchies have more power? It seems to me the only difference is the hereditary aspect of monarchy.
So if the legitimacy of monarchy was divine rule, wouldn't that be a spiritual, rather than a political question of whether monarchies are the best system.
Bye
Have fun at church!
We already call it soccer.
no u
More time for men to get days off.
I am a gamer
Good
Aryan
Man
Espousing
Racism
Gamers rise up
Thanks Daddy!
There was one thing Che Guevara was right on:
Oof
Does that mean we can't have Pinochet memes either @Doctor Anon ?
Welp, looks like Western civilization is fucked.
I know
That's why I posted it.
@Deleted User It's from this libtard news article https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/donald-trump-has-topped-the-google-image-search-result-for-idiot-1813457.html
Imagine being this beta
That copypasta is like 2 weeks old.
@addie I believe that is an image of George Lincoln Rockwell, smoking his signature corn cob pipe. If I am not mistaken, "Commander" Rockwell was the founded of the American Nazi Party after he was kicked of the US Armed Services for his political activism (against blacks and "communists" aka liberals, moderate conservatives, and Jesus Christ)
National socialists are just authoritarians who try to outedge communists lol.
Being edgy is gay, radical centrism is where the big brainers go.
The Jewish religion has negatively affected everyone. Christianity is a curious mix of Jewish beliefs and Pagan tradition and unfortunately, both are destroying Western society.
Let us remember that only 27 years ago from today, the largest empire of Marxist Socialism fell. And the millions that perished during the USSR's existence.
Read 1984 lel
That's true, a better book is Gulag Archipelago
But this is a discord server so nobody will probably have heard of it.
381 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/4
| Next