based and Christ-pilled

I'M A MUFFIn
AND iT'S MUFFIN TIMe

WHO WANTS A MUFFin

PLEASE I JUST WANNA DIE

PLEASE SOME BODY KILL ME

fuck no

Stop

PLEASE IT'S MUFFIN TIME

hush your shut hel the your up

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***imperatore Deli#0356 has been warned.***

fuck the shut you hush up

First QOTD - Ban @Doctor Anon in name of Christ?

bles

@Draco i cant be banned idiot

?ban @Doctor Anon

fuck he's right

?ban Daddy Anon

Democracy will prevail. We will storm Bastille

demogay

lmao

<:this:487682424562647060>

its been 10 minutes

<@&516817984782729217> Daily Question <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586>

- Does the Bible endorse slavery? Explain and Debate.

I sure as hell hope so

It endorses the fair treatment of servants

No. It condemns but allows slavery.

~~Africans gay lol~~

Hmm

The King James version never uses the word slave in the way that we think of slavery. Rev 18:13 and Jeremiah 2:14 are the only two times that the word slave is used in the KJV and it is clearly not talking about God condoning it whatsoever.

In fact the KJV uses the word servant for these verses that are said to condone slavery. For example I am a servant to my boss at work. All the verses that are supposedly supporting "slavery" can be looked at as servitude. There were instances where people in the bible were required to pay off debt by working it off through serving the person that they owed/stole from.

Forced slavery was punishable by death

For Hebrew servants they were required to be freed by their masters after 7 years. Of course the bible does not condone slavery. It is clearly talking about servitude: either willingly or because they owed money. Read these verses in the KJV in context and it will become very clear and evident.

And to add to my previous statement

There was a lot of indentured slavery in those days. Indentured slavery was basically an alternative to homelessness; it was a way of providing for your family when you ran out of the means to afford your own room and board. These slaves had to be released in the Year of Jubilee, Unless the slaves themselves chose otherwise

Read Leviticus 25:39-43

It condones slavery

Doesn't mean you have to own slaves

It does not. Which verse?

@Draco so it endorses it?

Condones means sanction. It does not endorse slavery

The only verse that could be read in this way -
Ephesians 6:5

theres also this interesting verse

Slaves, Obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ (Ephesians 6:5 NLT )

Which only endorses authority

but no, i.e i dont think the bible endorses slavery

If you are a slave, you must obey, is different than keeping slaves is ok

It is like one should obey laws does not mean that laws are just

Or they should not be changed in due time

Paul wished Philemon would release Onesimus from bondage and embrace him as a brother in Christ

You should get BibleBot in here. You just say a verse and it spits it out

Yep, and bots for other religions too. Daddy Anon is slacking in his job. Very bad.

@Draco I'll add biblebot if you remind me tommorow

Ok, sarge

Should religion rolls be a thing?

Can someone explain to me the major and nuanced differences between catholic and orthodox? besides the major obvious differences but rather the major differences people are not readily educated about.

Been thinking of potentially becoming orhtodox the past few years, dont know if I should go down that path because i simply cant seem to fully grasp the differences

islam superior

@Bogatyr Bogumir http://www.pravoslavie.ru/98156.html

@Doctor Anon you said my religion condones violence

LOL

@Muhammad Al-Tajir We have a common enemy, let's fight side by side

^^

@Muhammad Al-Tajir They have battled us for too long, it's time to claim the right to self defense.

Now you're contradicting yourself.

@Doctor Anon Bible Bot, Sargeant

@Vilhelmsson tell me something I said that isn't

@Doctor Anon that verse is not about arming the disciples for combat

They didn't use the swords

It's for self defense

It's not

It is

It's literally Jesus telling his disciples to get swords after Passover at the last supper

He rebukes them for thinking about combat

He tells them not to fight back for one instance

But they're armed

No Peter drew his sword and sliced off a Sanhedrin slave's ear after they're there to arrest and Jesus rebuked Peter for it

Read the entirety of Luke 22 and parallel it with Matthew's experience of it where he includes Jesus' reprimandation through the saying: Live by the sword and die by the sword

It isn't a promotion of arming yourself

You can't just cherry pick verses without knowing what happened at Gethsemane

<@&516817984782729217> Daily Question <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586>

- What's the correct view of the Trinity? Or is the Unitarian view right?

Kind of like the triforce

all have power

Yes

and are equal

Father the Son the Holy Spirit

but they all form to make God

Yes

But isn't God within all of us

It's like the US government

Executive

So does God have a separate conciousness

Legislativr

Whateverative

Subordinationism is best, I think

@Doctor Anon God is tripersonal with an indivisible essence

@el pebble does God have conciousness

Separate from the 3

Three separate minds with separate experiences, all unified in purpose and in being

@Doctor Anon

The father had different knowledge than Jesus