Or an oligarchy of 3-4

Have you ever read Hans-Hermann Hoppe?

Because monarchies are prone to hereditary corruption

My ideal monarchy would be a non hereditary internally elected one

Hereditary rule is precisely why monarchies is so effective and efficient.

With heavy requirements

Hereditary rule is disgusting

What do you think would happen in America with a parliament

It encourages monarchs (unlike democrats, who only worry about elections) to invest in the future of the country.

@WEBENGi we have a parliament dipshit

It's called Congress

They're not that different

Just different titles

And the upper chamber is elected as well

Hereditary rule is the only insurance that rulers will care about the future.

There are distinct differences.

@MinecraftMemer it's also prone to low IQ leaders

And inbreeding

@WEBENGi not so major they are unrecognizable ftomt each other

And in that case, they would have their nation (i.e. property) lose value.

And we would be dominated by smart, competent leaders.

Monarchies are just a no go for me anymore

I used to be a monarchist

Owned /mg/ Monarchist General

But the idea behind them, that nations are private property for an single individual, is much better than democracies.

Dictatorship is superior

Dictators are not concerned about the nation after they die like hereditary monarchs are.

Most are

They want the next dictator to keep the nation alive

Is there a solid incentive like hereditary monarchies?

Look at N.Korea

North Korea is a de facto hereditary monarchy.

It's technically elected

The only reason it is weak is because of communist, rather than capitalist economic policies.

Historically, Monarchies have focused on foreign affairs over domestic affairs

This is fact

Is focusing on foreign affairs intrinsic to monarchy, or is that just a trend?

I'm confused.

It's tied to Monarchies

Historically

And why is that?