Throttles
Discord ID: 516262128181837837
1,310 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/14
| Next
Send me some good books on economics @Green Syndicalism
I've studied some micro economics.
Yeah.
I know how to draw the graphs as well.
The basics are wrong?
Don't we assume cateris paribus in economics though
Oh.
Anything else?
Gonna go on libgen
Pirate e-books
A triangle does not have necessary existence.
A triangle does not possess omnipotence for example.
Nor is it sentient.
The properties we give to a triangle, doed not reflect the properties we have given to God.
@Puerto Rican Nelson Can you demonstrate that triangle to me?
And how does that reflect the qualities of God?
Or should I say properties
@Puerto Rican Nelson You can argue a mind through simulation theory. However you cannot go "incomprehensible, potent triangle".
We know what triangles are, hence why we can comprehend them. There exists no "incomprehensible triangle".
WLC is decent.
Personal agent?
No lol.
But he was afraid to say you combine it with the ontological argument
Which gets refuted
Also, @Puerto Rican Nelson just adhere to the b-theory of time so " began to exist" gets incoherent
Because it shows a flow of time, which b-theory rejects and imo b-theory is strongee than a-theory which was shown in the philosopher survey @pennypal
@Green Syndicalism any more resources you got? Like other sites or blogs, or maybe a reading list?
I have that already.
But he told me that the basics are wrong, meaning that book is basically wrong as well
@Green Syndicalism thanks
Yes
Yes
Are you a new keynesian or a post keynesian? @Green Syndicalism
Why was I pinged
Wrong throttles
Is there a muslim here
Who believes in nothing? @โญ trunks โญ
And why is it better?
Imagine advocating for labour theory of value.
I did.
I was just brought back to life.
I tried the labour theory of value.
@Gะพd You don't exist.
Debate me you coward @!GoldenKingship!
Like thrice @โญ trunks โญ
Wdym? @โญ trunks โญ
@Sh0t Do you genuinely think he knows who Locke would be? Lol.
Did they give justification or just asserted it? @Pelth
The hell? I think I'll stick to analytic philrel
@Feed Me Satan He's stupid lol.
>just learn a trade
LOL
Haha.
We don't need more blue collar workers thanks.
@iPhi What did you learn in engineering?
Such as?
Is it physics heavy?
None of this is valid code.
Yes.
@!GoldenKingship! prove God right now you coward
No I didn't.
How so?
Not really.
Because I want you to provide an argument.
A good one.
And I want you to concede.
Can you read?
I said prove God.
Where is your argument.
Why are you a Christian? @!GoldenKingship!
Why do you adhere to theism?
Yes.
Show that the theist position is acceptable.
Why?
How and why do you know?
@!GoldenKingship! Yes.
Hume has refuted this over and over again.
So has Salmon.
Salmon used Bayes Theorem to say that the universe is more probable in Atheism than Theism.
@!GoldenKingship! What does an apple tree have in relation to a universe?
Why are you extended material objects to immaterial?
I've refuted the argument from motion before.
Not really. There are people who reject common sense, but they still exist.
There is no material universe in your mind.
Stop spouting r/theist posts lol.
No, I'm a dualist in terms of philosophy of mind. However, physcalism can easily be defended in philosophy of mind.
@Togger property dualism
2.2
@Vagtarian check that link.
@!GoldenKingship! What?
Reality cannot be different, unless you believe in modal realism but possible worlds are causally isolated so this makes no sense.
We live in a public world*.
Correct philosophical language.
1,310 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/14
| Next