now I understand why he said what he said

changes nothing, but I can at least understand his perspective

is it alright to ask how much experience does Pius have in arguments regarding Godship

evidencial moralism doesn't exist

so fondboy's seeking on the subject is actually logically impossible to argue

you can't argue an objective evidence to morality without a divinity

which you can't argue towards in the first place

by divinity I'm not referring to a subject of the mind, by divinity I mean something that is beyond realms of reality and controls that reality

that's part of what I'm talking about

without an objective divinity to define an objective morality, you can't have either

that's what I'm arguing about, which is the problem with asking the question about seeking a enpirical moral framework

the problem is what is the point of man's existence in a reality that has no defintive purpose

that's what I was getting at btw, without an objective divine revelation, you'll never be able to found an objective morality

moral objectivity ignores an individual enviroment or value because it represents a value overriding all others

was the Alex Booth New York crap already discussed here?