I don't really get into the other ones one way or another... my primary draw is the science thinking of FE and the other ones dont really have that... so i don't really have a strong opinion about them... @Citizen Z

Yeah, like meltiong points and at all that? I'm sure there's stuff in 911 that i could get into.... I guess part of it is limited time too...

https://youtu.be/8llS0ZkLVGA?t=66

Seems like it would be hard to pull that off....

I'm open to the idea but "all wars are pre-scripted" doesn't sound like a fact. Natural wars breaking out in natural ways over limited resources sounds like an incredibly likely event?

@Black Thanos III https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40428132

@Black Thanos III https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russian-military-might-have-one-big-advantage-over-nato-war-29307

@Black Thanos III

@Black Thanos III https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/06/29/pentagon-russia-very-much-a-threat-to-the-united-states/

@Czepa That Einstein quote is a full-on fabrication.

lol

http://archive.hokulea.com/index/founder_and_teachers/lacy_veach.html

oh, i thought you were making a 'could they or couldn't they see the stars" joke... no,i don't think so... i think his exposures were all set for earht and inside the shuttle

but tbh there are so many CDs of pictuers and i've not gone through them with a finetooth comb or oanything... @wilman757

it's okay... trust me, i'm used to people coming at me like "your dad is a fucking liar, space is fake, etc" so I'm used to it

I know that FE belief dictates that conclusion. I don't take it personally.

Yep. Same with my server. Even globers I know are doubtful sometimes of NASA.

@wilman757 the issue is dynamic range of photography.. .it can't expose but very bright and very dim things at once.. so you have to pick one or the other basically

@wilman757 i'll look through the CDs next time i have some free time...see if i can find one

@HyperBaroque yeah, i could believe that... especially in recent years.....

@HyperBaroque like when my dad took thast pic it was a mechanical camera... analog... but these days a digital camera should be able to take 3 pics at once at different exposures all at once...

and then you can merge them basically

you know what the range was?

in terms of stops?

@HyperBaroque check it out: Dynamic Range
Once the almighty reason to shoot with analog film over digital, dynamic range is no longer the huge debate it once was in the past. While the dynamic range of an Image is a complex process that takes into account the sensor used, the type of file compression, and other factors, digital is ultimately winning against analog film.

A release by Kodak showcased that most film has around 13 stops of dynamic range. Today’s modern digital cameras all average around 14 stops of dynamic range, with high-end units such as the Nikon D810 reaching almost 15 stops. Film continuous to deliver incredible dynamic range, but today’s digital technology can easy match it.

Independent testing of dynamic range on film cameras, such as the tests conducted by Roger N. Clark, showed that high-end digital cameras in 2005 began to show “huge dynamic range compared to [scans of] either print or slide film”. Films used in the testing included Kodak Gold 200 and Fujifilm FujiChrome Velvia.

so basically, yes, you're right.. modern film has a wide range

and maybe there was a special fancy film back in the 70s that could do it too

It sounds like the claims of a paranoid schizophrenic..

I see Queen Mab hath been with you.

i'm missing part of my dick too

@Can't Mossad the Deusad thank you. it's not that big of a deal. i'm just missing the rabbit ears.

practically everyone in america is cised.

not so much for new babies... but people over a certain age. it was standard procedure for "hygenic" reasons

but these days they no longer think it's required so it's much less common

@Smoothie Mane you guys been adding members! nice job.

WHo's a mod in here?

hey mike!

and rig!

@Citizen Z hey man

@Seeker of Truth but nasa is real

@Seeker of Truth they say that, but also i see a lot of the truth of it with my own two eyes

@Seeker of Truth I wouldn't? How do you know that about me? I had incredibly good access to NASA and would know if it was fake.

@Seeker of Truth what makes you think nasa is fake?

@Seeker of Truth that makes ense to you? you don't see how absurd that claim is?

@Seeker of Truth In order to fake a death, they changed the hair, the height, the husband, the children, tehj eduation, the parents, teh hometown, the eyecolor, the pets, the relgiion of judith resnick but then LET HER KEEP HER NAME? what kind of sense does that make?

@Seeker of Truth think about it.

@!GPT you got a link to one of those?

@!GPT ok, thanks anyway, they book mark just the same as anything else.. in case you didn't know...

@Human Sheeple hi

@A Search for Roche's Rifle hey man, haven't heard you talk in forever...

@The Gwench long time no see... hello---!

@The Gwench I'm confused as to why he's talking about Epstein. Does this mean we've agreed to call it a misunderstanding and move on?

@Human Sheeple

i'm not a pedo, smh.

it's so not funny.

i am veach