!rank

t!rank

t!rank

t!rank @NiCKeLeSS

I don't feel so good, Mr. Chad

I don’t even know what’s going on anymore 😂😂😂

Did he take a picture of the stars..?

lol

Ha

http://archive.hokulea.com/index/founder_and_teachers/lacy_veach.html

Not being funny..did he?

oh, i thought you were making a 'could they or couldn't they see the stars" joke... no,i don't think so... i think his exposures were all set for earht and inside the shuttle

but tbh there are so many CDs of pictuers and i've not gone through them with a finetooth comb or oanything... @wilman757

@m. scott veach ok...just asking..not being an a**

Sorry

it's okay... trust me, i'm used to people coming at me like "your dad is a fucking liar, space is fake, etc" so I'm used to it

Thought the same

I know that FE belief dictates that conclusion. I don't take it personally.

Lots of people that deny the existence of space and stars here lol

Yep. Same with my server. Even globers I know are doubtful sometimes of NASA.

NASA has put out a lot of bullshit

@m. scott veach @Smoothie Mane I'm not pro or con...just seems that I would picture earth as well as stars..?

His dad was in low earth orbit so I don't think that shot would've been so easy

The main BS is the fake alien agenda @Smoothie Mane

@wilman757 the issue is dynamic range of photography.. .it can't expose but very bright and very dim things at once.. so you have to pick one or the other basically

You gotta consider the possibility that some of what theyre trying to "hide" they only want to seem like they are trying to hide it.

The old reverse psychology like tactic

I would have been interested to see what the pic looked like.ev en if it didn't come out...

i think there are certain heavy films that can expose both dim and bright faithfully, they are expensive but you no longer rely on the aperture decisions

@wilman757 i'll look through the CDs next time i have some free time...see if i can find one

@HyperBaroque yeah, i could believe that... especially in recent years.....

@m. scott veach ok thx..

these are old things iirc from the late 60s

err. maybe late 70s. i seem to rememver they are post french new wave

maybe even 80s

@HyperBaroque like when my dad took thast pic it was a mechanical camera... analog... but these days a digital camera should be able to take 3 pics at once at different exposures all at once...

and then you can merge them basically

well, the film exists. i think it was sensitive material but a bulk of it