Timo)))
Discord ID: 270965986620866571
6,016 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 4/61
| Next
the state was very much involved in the german economy, not really capitalism
wrong
If a state forbids you to sell your ''degenerate'' art then it isn't a capitalistic system
''some lines and squares on a canvas? can't sell em in this country''
states often are
most do
Friedman
I recommend this debate highly https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3N2sNnGwa4
please go
blocked
But yeah highly recommend that debate, or shorter videos on the sidebar if you don't have time
He's said many times that the system we have now is not actually capitalism
you'd be wrong, sorry
Dude I don't write it down
Capitalism isn't the same as it was in the 20's
The states influence rose over the years
1920
Yes, the decade of the 1920s
what is wrong?
Way more capitalistic than what we have now
closer to actual capitalism
corporatism
state involvement in things as welfare and healthcare
It's not fair capitalism if you have top compete with the state
libertarianism also has the social freedom, capitalism doesn't say much about homosexuality and such
Well shame for you then
Still very much recommend that debate I linked, a fair debate with two competent sides
doesn't have to be tonight
Simply socialists vs capitalists
dude lmao
watch it or don't
not always, can be conservative too
go find out
cause I don't remember, not that it's any big deal in a debate anyway
Okay dude watch it or don't I don't care
I'm not going to rewatch it to tell you what his side specifically is called
communists don't believe in free speech anyway
Their system is so good you don't even get to complain
If you're saying that a free market is not capitalism I don't know what to tell you
What economic books have you read that claim it isn't?
If you want to learn more about how a capitalist thinks about free market the second part does that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJWLt1TmAy4
Goes in depth on how government intervention (tariffs, subsidized companies etc) decrease the freedom of the market
You seem to think there are millions of forms of socialism but only one form of capitalism (the system we have right now)
Very wrong
I don't dispute that
When you have welfare, tariffs, subsidized industries and the likes you're not dealing with a fully capitalistic system
Free market is almost the exact same thing as capitalism
Or can you show me an example of a free market that does not resemble capitalism?
If you cannot own your own product without it being collectively owned by ''the people'' you do not have a free market
There's more than one form of capitalism
that's why laissez faire capitalism is a thing
If you have to compete with the state funded company it isn't a free and fair market
the market has become less free when you have to compete with a business that simply will not fail because the state supports it
it's not fair competition
the freer the market the more capitalistic it is
Those happen in every system because the governments grants them special treatment
In a truly capitalistic society they would only have to do 2 things to rise to the top: deliver the best product at the best price
Name me a system without monopolies
lmao
the monopoly there is the state
Having all the resources, making it very hard for newcomers to challenge you
The socialist state often make it extremely hard because of all sorts of rules you have to abide to
Right, and the socialist state fits that to a t
Because you forbid it to let people make their own decisions to run their own company, it's anti freedom
Probably because they are hindered in opening their own business
Have to deal with the unions, regulations and being taxed to high hell
Yet people from China fled to Hong Kong
Compared to what other country around it?
What's a better country near hong kong?
Indonesia? Malaysia? Japan with it's insane work hours?
Compared to your socialist utopia yes
I'd rather compare it to other countries in history
The one that has never been achieved by any socialist country
Or can you point to one?
Very poor compared to the west at that time
Yes
Or did the western people flee to Yugoslavia?
No but people do to Hong Kong, Singapore and the west in general
If it's a shining beacon people will go to it
It really does
Why else would they come here?
Because the chinese government promised no competition I imagine
I'll be back in a bit, like 15 min
Why take China as an example when Hong Kong or Singapore are much more capitalistic?
And if you get to say that china is capitalistic than I can open up a can of worms with your socialists utopias all day long
Where was the paradise for the millions who starved under backwards retarded socialist policies?
Was there any social mobility in the socialist countries?
Face it, capitalism won in the end, sadly a lot of countries are now falling into the same trap of thinking the state should provide ever more services
And if you say that wasn't real socialism well then
It's simply the result of having that much power in the hands of so few, you only need one malevolent moron to take power to bring your people to starvation
Never said it was exclusive to capitalism, just that to have capitalism you have to have a free market
capitalism was a thing before people called it capitalism, as with most things the name comes later
People tend to not like their lenders, jew were often bankers
yeah and a whole lot more
entire media basically
How come Japan turned into a richer country than China?
They were equally poor at around 1860
Same thing with Chile, how come they are the most wealthy latin country?
US supported Pinochet but not with subsidies
6,016 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 4/61
| Next