What's up, niggers?

Can I have my roles back?

!Monarchist

!Traditionalist

!Catholic

!feudalist

Alrighty.

What's up, niggers?

@The Desert Fox V More specifically, a coal burner is any non-black woman who race mixes with a black man. A coal burner doesn't have to be white, she can be of any race besides black. The male equivalent (i.e. a non-black man who mixes with a black woman) is called an oil driller.

A tomboy is just a butch chick.

Reactionary systems last for thousands of years. Liberal systems, on the other hand, only last for a few centuries tops before being replaced with a reactionary system. How did we get to the decadence we have now? We deviated from our societal foundations, starting with the Reformation and snowballing from there. The thing is, when you tolerate even the slightest bit of modernist philosophy, it will turn into the shit we have now because one revolution always fuels another.

The only way to get rid of the problem is to fully embrace the West's foundations. That means accepting all the logos and rejecting all the anti-logos:

We only started having problems when we embraced modernism.

If we started to completely reject modernism and instead completely embrace the logos, society would be thriving once again.

@IliasSpook No, we had problems as soon as the Reformation hit. Without the Reformation, the Enlightenment would've never been able to happen.

You can see the slippery slope here. ^

Like I said, one revolution always fuels another.

@Cвятогор It's not a pagan concept, it's a Greek philosophical concept.

@IliasSpook But the Church didn't fail. Seriously, I'm only a Catholic because I actually studied this history.

@Cвятогор You guys pulled a Henry VIII centuries before Henry VIII, all because the Byzantine emporer didn't like the pope.

@Cвятогор Oh sorry, no. I was trying to tag someone else.

@IliasSpook That's an Enlightenment concept and that's part of what got us to where we are now. You gotta have a moral foundation for society, separation of church and state never ends well.

The Catholic Church was infiltrated by communist freemasons in the 1930s who made it go underground in the 60s. Ever since then, the men claiming to be popes have been these freemasons, which is why they always say and do anti-Christian stuff.

The masons were drooling over the idea of infiltrating the Church for a century prior to the actual attempt, which only occurred in the 1930s.

Matthew 16:18 - 19
And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven.

@IliasSpook @Traveler No, a castizo is someone who is 3/4 white and 1/4 Native American. People who are a mix of nigger and Native American are called zambos.

If you want to learn about the types of mutts, look into the Casta system. The Spaniards has a name for almost every kind of mutt:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casta

Reactionary modernism is like water that isn't wet. You can have either reactionary or modernism, but not both because they're exact opposites.

Hitler despised Christianity, especially Catholicism. That's why he created his own sect (aka the so-called "Positive" Christianity) to wean people off of Christianity.

A fascist monarchy is just bullshit. These are 2 completely different, incompatible ideologies.

I was born in 2000 and I'm a reactionary. From what I've seen, it's usually people around the ages of late teens to 20s/30s that are most likely to be reactionaries.

My dad said that it didn't matter that they used wooden doors because they had so much gas that they didn't need to contain it.

Well, my dad is a liberal so.... he's not the sharpest tool in the shed.

You don't have to be a stoner to figure out the fact that Hitler was a fag.

@Swatziland How pathetic that people literally worship Hitler as if he was God.

He may not have killed six gorrillion kikes but that doesn't make him a saint.

Hitler shat on Christianity, especially Catholicism, praised Islam, and was a soyboy.

He was a soyboy before being a soyboy was a thing.

Hitler was a cuck.

Anyone who worships him has their head very far up their ass.

No dude, most of them are not even larping.

That's the worst part.

Doesn't surprise me.

Pagans are just cringelords.

He didn't do anything besides point out the truth.

Hitler was a cuck. Get your head out of your ass and admit it.

@Swatziland Don't act too shocked/pissed, they'll use it against you.

No, pagans are just cringey.

Hitler rejected the religion that built Western Civilization, and made his people go from albino niggers to productive members of society.

The truth hurts.

@Deleted User You gonna ban me for hurting your wittle fee fees?

I didn't do anything but point out the truth.

^

I posted memes that show the truth.

Christianity bad, goy.

@Deleted User It depends on the context. In the right context, it's good because it shows that one is mature enough to not sperg out over every mean thing that is said/done to them.

"Muh sola scriptura"

(Even though the Bible itself debunks sola scriptura)

Sola scriptura is a protestant doctrine that says that the Christian scriptures are the sole source of authority for Christian faith and practice, even though the scriptures contradict that.

The Bible + apostolic tradition is the real authority for Christian faith and practice, as the Bible says. Not everything Jesus said is in the Bible. Some things he said were passed down as oral traditions by the apostles and their successors.

John 21:25
But there are also many other things which Jesus did; which, if they were written every one, the world itself, I think, would not be able to contain the books that should be written.

They countered it in the Just War Principle, saying that yeah normally you should turn the other cheek, but sometimes self defense is necessary.

Their successors did. Remember, the apostles weren't immortal.

No, he's not even a Christian. He likes homosexuals, worships the Amazonian earth goddess, is a freemason, the list goes on and on.

How could he be the leader of a group he's not even a part of?

That's nonsensical.

No, you can't.

Francis is openly non-Christian and he wasn't even validly elected because all the real cardinals died of old age before he was supposedly elected.

It's not coping, it's the truth.

Seriously, I started studying it as an agnostic.

No, it's the truth because anyone who studies it can see that.

I wouldn't really blame anyone for being agnostic either, given the times we live in, where practically everyone and everything is secular, it makes sense that people would be agnostic. I was agnostic for most of my life.

By holy wine, are you referring to the blood of Christ?

Because they don't even make the blood of Christ in the first place.

Wine or Coca Cola, it doesn't matter because it's not the blood of Christ anyway.

No dude, the Church says that if you change the form and/or matter of any traditional rite for the sacraments then it's invalid, including the eucharist.

He said it with his actions, which speak louder than words.

Though he also said it with his words by saying that converting people is a bad thing, embracing indifferentism, embracing homosexuality, and so on.

No, the Just War Principle is a very old Church doctrine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_war_theory#Christian_views

Depending on the crime, it could be.

Obviously if someone steals 1 buck, it would be unjustifiable to give them the death penalty because it's such a petty crime.

But if someone does a major crime like murdering somebody, then yeah the death penalty is absolutely justifiable.

God is both just and merciful. It's not either one or the other.

And thus, we should be the same way.

In an address given on 14 September 1952, Pope Pius XII made clear that the Church does not regard the execution of criminals as a violation by the State of the universal right to life, arguing that:
When it is a question of the execution of a condemned man, the State does not dispose of the individual's right to life. In this case it is reserved to the public power to deprive the condemned person of the enjoyment of life in expiation of his crime when, by his crime, he has already disposed himself of his right to live.