Raintola

Discord ID: 230751539554287617


253 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/3 | Next

"Crime"? Maybe. "Violent crime"? Not likely.

As for "the wrong angle". Yeah, you're definitely coming at the wrong angle. It doesn't matter whether it's the angle that "you want". I can "want" until the sun dies, but that doesn't make it "right".

Nah, that doesn't fly. You don't get to "tell people they're wrong". It literally doesn't mean anything without supporting evidence.

See, I can do the same thing. "You're wrong. There's evidence suggesting that harsh punishments do reduce crime. I'm not going to Google shit for you since you're supposed to educate yourself blah blah blah"

>Implying Google results aren't in and of themselves biased

Oh look, no evidence. All it does is claim that "punishment doesn't reduce crime" because of high incarceration rates. The article is presuming that, because one person is harshly punished, it magically increases the intent of others to commit crime. The article literally contradicts itself by pointing out lower crime rates in combination with higher incarceration rates.

Who said it was?

Lots of links, zero evidence. What you seem to not understand is that the point of punishments has nothing at all to do with prevention. Literally no laws or punishments prevent crime, so you're operating under nothing but a giant strawman.

@Muten Well aware, but it isn't necessarily about informing the zealot, but the audience who the zealot may be talking to.

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM Bad faith actors. They're well aware that laws and punishments do not prevent crime. For example, take old laws involving inter-racial cohabitation. No one cared about the law or the punishment.

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM Or they disingenuously interpret the issue in a certain way. This is a perfect example. Based on Ninja's logic, one person being punished somehow has some kind of mystical influence on another person's intention to commit crime.

@Muten Which only further strengthens our point that they aren't able to provide any actual evidence. Just links to opinion pieces or strawman articles.

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM Not agreeing is fine. Them agreeing isn't really required.

@Jake the Exile Hardly. No one says "Guns don't kill people because it's the bullet that causes injury." Punishment being a deterrent may have some effect, but based on Ninja's own sources, most of the people in prison already aren't in a normal mindset, so they likely don't fear the punishment to begin with.

@Jake the Exile Even then, we're not talking about whether they fear going to jail, we're talking about if the threat of punishment actually prevents the crime from happening. I can fear lots of things, but fear doesn't necessarily prevent me from doing them.

@Jake the Exile That would require the presumption that people ARE raised in such a mindset to begin with. I'm fairly certain most people don't think that a person's parents teach them that criminality is okay. Nevermind that would require psychoanalyzing every family unit in order to determine if they're teaching their kids "the right thing"

@NinjaQuick The UK is an outlier based on what, exactly?

@Jake the Exile The same place "fuck the church" comes from in people raised in a religious home. They come to that conclusion on their own.

@Muten Staying away from police doesn't equate to committing crime though. Hell, I'd bet most white families teach their kids to stay away from the cops too..by not committing crime

@NinjaQuick No shit, which is the entire point. No one gives a fuck about punishment not preventing crime because it was never designed to in the first place.

If punishment was intended to prevent, life sentences would be the norm for first time offenders. Can't re-offend if you never make it out of jail.

What do you mean "and what"? Violating 7A doesn't make me statement any less correct.

Deterrence theory may by the core of the justice system, but we're not talking about the justice system as a whole, we're talking about a single facet.

Putting people in prison was never about stopping people from committing crimes.

It was for restitution

You can go back and look at Hammurabi's code

Or "an eye for an eye"

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck Maybe if you're a cyclops

@NinjaQuick You're literally illiterate. The point is that the entire history of punishment for crimes committed is that, when a person commits an act that society deems morally reprehensible, that person must effectively pay society back. That payback can come in the form of loss of life (death penalty), fines, loss of limb, or removal from society (imprisonment)

Again

Eye for an eye

The entire point

Pre-enlightenment or not, that doesn't alter my point

Again, so? Your problems with the society at the time doesn't negate the overall intention of punishment

Also, pretty sure the Hebrews weren't sun worshippers. Hell, their calendar is based on lunar cycles.

@NinjaQuick We have that already. A person is taken to trail individually, the case is analyzed, and they are given a sentence. Mandatory/minimum sentencing doesn't somehow negate this.

@NinjaQuick They plea out by their own choice.

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck A theory. Based on "plausible mentions" from groups around the same area where Hebrews originated.

@NinjaQuick As opposed to getting a harsher sentence if they do stand trial. If they can't win a trial, that is usually because the evidence against them is so overwhelming.

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck And? Jesus existing being a theory isn't a bad thing.

@NinjaQuick The probation, but why would that choice be given to me unless the evidence against me was so overwhelming that a trial would simply be a formality?

@NinjaQuick How is it fucked? It's' doing exactly what you want. That person's case is analyzed on an individual basis and they're being given an option for a less harsh punishment.

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck When did I say it was a bad thing? Most readers of the Bible already think that Hebrews came from Canaan.

@NinjaQuick Go back and look at my first post. I specifically separated "violent crimes" from "crime". G fucking G

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck I never said you did. Literally no one here but you disputed Yahweh's origins.

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck And again, where did I claim that you said it? Why bothering bringing up theories about the origins of Yahweh when no one was disputing it in the first place?

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck No, that's you reading too far into what I said. All I said was what you've linked. If you think I was implying such, that's on you.

@NinjaQuick By your logic raping an unconscious person shouldn't be a problem because no violence was involved.

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck Again, so what? What does this have to do with no one but you trying to dispute Yahweh's origins? As far was we know, "Yahweh" was the God of the Hebrews. The same name may have been used by other Canaanite tribes, but that has little else to do with the Hebrews' interpretations of said deity.

@NinjaQuick We know it's actual rape, but it is explicitly non-violent. However, it is still very much a crime.

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck I never said you thought it was a bad thing. I made a single statement and you took it as an accusation. Your issue.

The person viewing the illegal material. They are a victim of their own choice (and stupidity).

We're also presuming that "viewing" is implying someone explicitly choosing to view that specific material.

That most certainly can be the victim. They chose to view the material knowing it was illegal.

They certainly can. Who is the victim in a suicide? The person who killed themselves.

Nah bruh

Suicide is a crime in several countries

@NinjaQuick Retarded or not, still a crime. Nevermind that "victim" isn't explicitly used in reference to a crime. I can be a victim of an accident.

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck Again, that's all on you bruh. I made a single statement and you took what I said and added your own implications to it. Saying something isn't a bad thing does, in no way, imply anything else other than what was explicitly stated. This is like when people get uppity about "It's okay to be white" signs. They apply meaning to it based on their own prejudices.

@NinjaQuick There is a victim. The person who downloaded it.

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck Again, so what? I'm not the one denying my projected implications.

@NinjaQuick So I should be able to just go outside and detonate a bomb I've made. Cuz I made it.

@NinjaQuick So any collateral effects of my detonation should therefore be fine too?

@SideTracker Technically that's diving, not swimming.

@NinjaQuick That assumes criminals want to be educated or weren't educated from the start.

@NinjaQuick This is the same logic as "Teach men not to rape". Pretty sure most men are taught not to rape, even those who grew up to be rapists.

Not even

Education means squat if it's simply ignored.

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM I mean, if you're going to live in a country where 16 year-olds are off limits, it might be a good idea to follow that limit.

2019-10-06 23:38:31 UTC [Athens #uk_politics]  

"The aim of the Labour Party is to be in....what?" "Incompetent!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JKvNoZzOEw

They also have to keep it in a bun that doesn't exceed a certain size.

Because she isn't in the workplace to be nice on the eyes in most cases

Nah, most of ours do paperwork

Wait so Swinson lost?

Ooooh gotcha.

So how are those riots in London coming?

Cenk advocating for bestiality.

I would be surprised if she knew what a noodle was.

2019-12-14 20:06:32 UTC [Athens #us_politics]  

@FitnessByHeatherHeyer Low-IQ white niggers listening and believing when white lefties claim to be Jewish.

2019-12-17 14:37:35 UTC [Athens #us_politics]  

Do you lift?

2019-12-17 14:38:34 UTC [Athens #us_politics]  

I'm sure the meme would still be true if we looked at the ratio of crime committed by black and white females.

2019-12-17 14:38:45 UTC [Athens #us_politics]  

Violent or otherwise.

2019-12-17 14:39:07 UTC [Athens #us_politics]  

Right, gmvh

2019-12-17 14:39:45 UTC [Athens #us_politics]  

No I'm aware, I live in Bama.

2019-12-17 14:43:03 UTC [Athens #us_politics]  

"You got radicalized by the Alt-Right Youtube Pipeline" - The Guardian probably

2019-12-17 14:44:11 UTC [Athens #us_politics]  

So you're a perpetually constipated diabetic now from all that bread

2019-12-17 14:44:55 UTC [Athens #us_politics]  

That's what I said, socialists are perpetually constipated diabetics.

253 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/3 | Next