politics-free-for-all
Discord ID: 372513679964635138
182,758 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 57/732
| Next
is that a Russian flag off to the right of the frame?
nyet
looks like it is; white blue and red horizontal stripes
Slovenia maybe?
The shield could easily be obscured from that angle
@Reaps
To be fair, they are at least closer to the real deal
>is that a Russian flag off to the right of the frame?
wot
tbh the slovakian is very similar to the russian one
feel free to, you know, look at the photo
guy in the second row, behind tiki torch man with the shoulder strap
pretty similar
Pan-slavic colors
<:think_woke:378717098681171988>
I agorreeee wit dat
>definitely not a soy smile
he has a bf bruh
That chickfile crap was a made up outrage
Chickfile employes tons of gays and lesbians
Progressives don't understand that being against gay marriage doesn't mean that they want to gas the gays
they were just against the madatory abortion/birth control law. But the company is religious based. Hell they arnt even open sundays
They really werent even against gay marriage lol. The groups they donated to did many things, gay marriage was an after thought, but a thought due to the charity backgrounds.
Chick-fil-A donates to several Christian organizations, including The Marriage & Family Legacy Fund, The Fellowship of Christian Athletes and the National Christian Foundation. According to its statement, Chick-fil-A has given the groups $1,714,199. None of the organizations the company supports has an โanti-gayโ agenda, although as Christian groups, they do uphold and support heterosexual marriage, Donald A. Perry, the companyโs vice president of corporate public relations, said in his statement.
Fellowship of Christian Athletes do a lot of scholorships for christian athletes. That is their primary focus. The *pro hetero marriage* isnt their primary concern
But even so. They didnt descriminate against their workers. Many of who are probably in a gay marriage.
So false outrage
Im not against gays. Im against public indecency and people runnin round the streets half naked with their ding dong basically stickin out while around children.
Agreed. Used to be public decency to keep your sexual life behind closed doors.
Hell there are tons of gays that do just that as well. Oddly they tend to be more christian or jewish. Wonder if there is a causation there between religious and decency, or just a corolation*
i don't mind the pride parade, but that's not a excuse to act like a fucking retarded
some stuff that happens it's just stupid
Why does there need to be umpteen parades how ever many days, weeks and a month?
I mean. We get it. Your gay. Who the hell cares really?
Well other than Islamists...But they are buay looking for roofs to throw them off.
Why does there need to be pride parades at all when the original goal was acceptance and normalization?
They have it. Its celebration now, which reverses those gains.
Yeah, it's celebration
i don't bother about that
but, the same rules that applies to anyone else, should apply to them
Yeah, if anything as Caledus stated the pride parade does not normalize being gay or homosexual at all. It infact puts more attention to the subject encouraging more backlash to it or makinh it look like a "social fad" which does not do it any good either. I mean yeah understandable that at one point homosexuality needed attention to help address social issues, but I find it less of an issue these days. Most people dont give a shit if your gay or not as long as you are not sitting there constantly condecending on others beliefs.
But theb again im just preaching to the choir.
It also takes away from the *gay isnt a choice* arguement when it becomes a *cultural fad*
I donโt mean to change the subject too hard, but can I ask about the steel and aluminum tariffs? I understand that China is by far the biggest producer of those metals, and America is one of the biggest consumers. So why should we be concerned about protecting our steel/aluminum industries? I could see small tariffs on finished products, like foreign cars, computers, and electronics, which America makes a lot of. But our steel/aluminum companies can never hope to outstrip China in the long run, so why not encourage a transition from refining to manufacturing, domestically, and let China stay industrial and produce the materials which we can make more expensive, better stuff out of. China gets a customer, and we get cheap materials as we progress into our information economy. It seems a win/win, rather than the tariffs now where nobodyโs really winning.
Tarriffs are more than just that. The tarrifs are semi punishing. And honestly we arnt hurting badly from them. To be honest everyone overhypes chinas economic power. They really arnt that strong. And what i find ironic is the us pays high tariffs to many other countries on products, but the moment the US says anything about raising ours, not even to their level its bad.
Do you know why? All those countries have many things on a socialist model. And use the tariffs to help pay the deficits that makes. So to tarriff back or them lowering there is would cause to many issies with their models. Notice though the moment it was mentioned about the allies, china was forgotren about by most nations m
In the end its 80% political. The thing about it is China does export a lot of that. But they import massive amounts of food [still not enough to feed their people. But communism]
Much of that food is American soy and rice.
There wont be a trade war. The communists dont want it. It will end in starvation and rebellion against the PRC
@Trebjonn how "right wing" is the progress party?
Guy gives incorrect definition of fascism and thousands of tedtards fall for it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHHb7R3kx40
@Deleted User they are the most anti immigrant party
Fascism is when you post Frogs on the internet. Obviously!
I looked at the independent article and I've seen a self-professed norwegian call them fascists and far right
@Deleted User if they were far right they would not be on coalition government
```About Norway , voting for a Nobelprice to Trump, this came from two of our most extreme within the Fremskrittspartiet, our ultra right - notorious for racist and islamofobic views. these people don't represent Norwegian views.
```
@Deleted User they are the most vocal whats happens in sweden
thanks for clearing things up
They are the 3d biggest party
Progress Party
hahahaa
VERY PROGRESSIVE!
lol
You silly Trump supporters, Nobel Peace Prize isn't meant for actual peace.
<:what:382980756139409409>
They coined the term sneak islamisation is prolly the worst they done and that was 10 year ago
what does `sneak islamisation` mean?
Its when islam sneaks into society by laws or sociatel norms that are destructive
I'm guessing it's Obama going on TV and saying "Islam is the most peaceful religion".
Normatilazation of islams worst parts
That was Bush Jr
@Deleted User for context the 2 biggest parties are 25 % each and progress is 15%
and those two are "Liberals" and the "Center Right" parties?
I guess
Its kinda hard to break down in american terms
Thanks inquisitor Floki for the answer to my question. Makes a lot more sense now.
But they are our rightmost parties
But we also a have a party called left thats in coalition with proggres and right
<:thronk:441701565607444482>
What the fuck. The guy in the TED talk said that fascism is A) believing your country is the best and B) feeling a special obligation to it. He also referred to Israel as a fascist dictatorship on par with Nazi Germany and the USSR.
This is like George Soros 2.0
He believes Israel is NatSoc?
Maybe he's alt-right <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>
Israel gets hate from far left and far right.
Both of them seem to love Palestine
I don't know which group has more cognitive dissonance vis-a-vis Israel though
Well lets see, the alt-right probably less honestly because all they want is a final solution, the far left wants to help victims which they would be doing the opposite of.
The far left tends to be full of secular Jews whom would be the first up against the firing wall if Palestine were ever to be 'free'
The far right constantly seems to argue that Israel is an ethnostate, which is what many of them advocate for, yet they still want Israel destroyed by Palestinians; Palestinians whom would also happily murder *them* too
I wonder if black people could be in positions of political power within their white ethnostate <:think_hitlerdidnothingwrong:378717099952177162>
Or vote
Or serve in the armed forces..
Do they actually want Israel destroyed? All I'm aware of is that they want the US to stop supporting them.
Depends which ones you talk to
They often believe those things are mutually inclusive.
I would think the alt-right doesn't sympathize with the left in giving a shit about palestine.
you'd think that
But plenty of them seem to actually be pro-Palestine
They probably hate the sand people and the jews.
weird
That's what you'd expect
so they actually see them as oppressed? I guess I can see them thinking that if they *really* hate the jews.
I guess maybe it's not a total surprise; many of these 'alt-right' types were basically painted as hard-left by the Bush-era right because all they could see were people who hated Israel and whom blamed the Jews for everything
Or are they just pro-palestine because they know that the palestinians just want to kill the jews so they just want to let them take care of the problem?
Anyway it's all weird. The crazy thing is that this Israeli guy straight up gave a ted talk... remotely mind you... weird hologram shit... with some bullshit made up definition of fascism, and he referred to Israel as a fascist state. What the fuck is that about?
And people fell for it! The video has tons of likes!
OY VERY VEY
tedtards are insufferable
It's almost like an impulsive, uncontrollable modus operandi
pretty good summation
Where manipulation and rhetoric becomes so commonplace to use against your enemies that you assume everyone else is doing it to you, so you justify that as your reasoning for using manipulation and.. round and round we go
From a 2006 'anti-war' march. far left or far right? Probably socialist in either case
Anti-Bush, pro-Russia: the origins of the alt-right? ๐คฃ
Kaffiyeh culture
"but muh hors-"
Picture these signs at something like the Charlottesville rally and just how much media coverage these signs would've had
90% of /pol/ are LARPers.
Oh look, a Vee video with no rambling.
Heresy
There must always be a rant
Heard on the Radio that someone from FiveThirtyEight is claiming that all these "pro-Trumpers" are infiltrating the Republican party to operate it like a cult dedicated to Trump
TDS is real folks
aye
just listen to Sam Harris
he gone bonkers over trump
no
I see enough TDS irl, I don't need to see it online as well
it was Trump's birthday today as well
but but but the NeverTrumpers keep losing elections
IT'S A CULT! <:covfefe:440543908846632980>
lol Not that they lost touch with their base entirely
they streaming right now
lol
Quite a divide of the genders there ๐ค
Just realized an argument against femenists.
Instead of them demonizing men they could be productive and help empower women by ensuring they know their own self worth, proper self defense, and how to have confidence in them selves during conversation, meeting, or arguments.
Instead they just push the problem over and blame others instead of gettin off their lazy ass and doing somethin to better themselves.
But then they might stop being victims and we can't have that /s
A professional activist lives to justify their activism. Don't assume feminists want any problem solved.
Otherwise Feminism would become irrelevant.
What DKO said.
Same with race baiters. They make money off of the notion that white supremacy is a serious issue. Why would they want it to go anywhere?
Feminists are against femininity itself. They're against the conceptual woman.
And BLM is against racial integration.
The ideal woman is a man, in their narrative. A man that's handed all privileges without fighting for any.
Remember Cathy Newman, asking "why should women have to compete for positions of power?"
The point is to demand something unattainable, unreasonable, so the fight is forever.
"If Tommy Robinson gets killed in prison, I will personally be advocating for a revolution" - Steven Crowder
That's what I was talking about. Where's the breaking point?
A docile population becomes Venezuela, North Korea.
Sweden.
Steven is bai
This is something that Sargon needs to get working on, ASAP.
What is the point of no return
What is the Rubicon
The rubicon is a river in italy
Sargon's solution is for Tommy to run for MP, 3 years from now when he becomes eligible.
Thats could very well be too long
The most important thing about this decision would be it would have to be verified, and obvious. Donโt start a war over something that is alleged
And pretty much requires that Tommy stay out of controversy, and generally out of politics, during that time.
And that the UK doesn't get much worse in the meantime.
(Which probably wonโt happen)
Tommy is already marred. And do you know if UK allows those convicted of a crime to hold office?
Just can't have beeen in jail for more than 10? months within less than 3 years or running
ah
Is there a criminal level bar too? I cant see a person convicted in a corruption case or murder or something being able to hold office
@Thomas the Sowell Train [USA]
he and a few others, expect people to get way more radical if this happens
I don't think so
Yo don't think people will become radicalized if Tommy dies in prison?
Did you not see the riots that already happened?
It is certainly possible
The working class is already very angry.
Quite understandably.
If he is brutally murdered, I can beyond garuntee there will be riots
If there are just protests...
Then it goes down to how the british police react
as i said before, people will get more radical
but, i don't think this will be the "breaking point"
it will be the beginning of something tho
I think the response to the protest will be the breaking point
Boston Massacre style
nah
there still a lot to happen
plus, i don't even think that thing will get that violent
You never know
Wars have been fought for less
(Well, specifically a 1% tax)
yeah, i know
but, you are talking about a docile population that allowed the government to take a lot of their privacy and to become borderline full authoritarian
people won't flip because of the death of one dude
Like I said, you never know
Sargon looked it up in a stream, needs to be off prison for 2 years to run.
So, current sentence + 2 years.
Thought it was 5 years
Does anybody know anything about this Christopher Wray fella? Our new FBI director?
He's a CUCK
Looks like he spent two years as the AG under Bush, he got "the Edmund J. Randolph Award, the Justice Department's highest award for public service and leadership." not sure what for exactly.
after that he went into private practice
looks like he's basically just a lawyer
"Among other testimony, when asked if he believed that the investigation into Russian election interference and possible links to Trump's campaign is a "witch hunt", he stated that he did not."
interesting
```On February 13, 2018, in a hearing before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Senator Marco Rubio asked Wray about the risk posed from Chinese students in advanced science and mathematics programs....Wray stated "nontraditional collectors" are "exploiting the very open research and development environment that we have" and consequently he viewed the risk "as not just a whole of government threat but a whole of society threat"....Representatives Chu, Lieu, and Meng released statements criticizing Wray's response as "irresponsible generalizations" implying that all Chinese students and scholars were spies. A coalition of Asian American advocacy groups wrote an open letter to Wray asking for a dialogue "to discuss how well-intentioned public policies might nonetheless lead to troubling issues of potential bias, racial profiling, and wrongful prosecution." In a follow-up interview with NBC, Wray stood by his earlier remarks, elaborating that "To be clear, we do not open investigations based on race, or ethnicity, or national origin. But when we open investigations into economic espionage, time and time again, they keep leading back to China."```
All three reps criticizing him were Dems. Looks like he may have been the target of a political correctness smear, purely speculating.
If I'm not mistaken it looks like not very many people are liking this guy on either side of the fence.
That may just be business as usual for new players on the scene, though. On the right, in response to his news conference, people are saying he's essentially full of bs, a liar. His overall message is one of reforming the FBI based on the lessons to be learned from the recently released Comey Report.
@Thomas the Sowell Train [USA] These days trump could nominate the best of the best for a position and both sides would hate it. Because the Dems and the Rhinos want trump to fail. Kinda like their back and forth with tbe korea thing. When it was on they said *He shouldnt do it*, and *hes not experienced enough* or *kim is pulling the strings. Then when trump cancelled it. They criticized him for *not wantjng peace*. When it was back on the first happened again. These days it has to do with who it is or what it is. just is trump involved. These people are gonna damage us beyond repair.
Moral Subjectivists annoy me (or maybe this is Moral Relativists)
"We disagree on subjects relating to morality."
"Ergo morality is never right nor wrong and is dependent entirely on the opinion of the individual."
Wow that's a fucking leap
Wonder why we don't attribute that reasoning to politics ๐ค
Probably because it's wrong. If theres such a thing as political ignorance why isn't there such a thing as moral ignorance?
If someone politically ignorant is more likely to be wrong on particular subjects then why would that be any different for someone who is morally ignorsnt?
Why is political ignorance a thing but moral ignorance not?
I think itโs moral relativists
And theyโre some of the most ignorant jackasses you can ever meet
Oh believe me I know.
They are people who would defend their murderers or rapists
They make the same arguments as Christians, bizarrely.
What do you mean?
"You cannot disprove or prove Moral Relativism, ergo Moral Relatvism is true."
Ah
The default state of things is false
Not true
They're kinda on the same boat eith Nihilists. At least Nihilists don't ALWAYS act pretentious at least.
Ye
Still Nihilists are up there imo.
They range from "edgy teens except it was never a phase" to the equivilant of carefree potheads wasting away or too in denial of their own position to give it any actual thought.
My thing with nihilists is, โwhy donโt you just keel over already?โ
Thereโs no point in anything right?
Theres no point to anything, ergo I'm going to pretend theres no point to anything, essentially.
So it's either be a Nihilist and not actually be a Nihilist, or be a Nihilist and be a depressed fuck.
That's my thing; Nihilism is the ultimate moral convenience.
Yep
182,758 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 57/732
| Next