#general (Discord ID: 372507611284766722) in /r/SargonOfAkkad (Sparta), page 45
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
where's the debate at?
the sassy furry with attitude is here
better watch out BUSTER
Are you a fan of Sargon?
I'm confronting my mother in law about her constant buying of Halal meat.
if she knew you were a furry she'd buy you haram just to spite you
There was an invite on pol for alt-right fags.
yeah I saw the /pol/ thread
I like listening to Sargon occasionally. Calling myself a fan would be stretching it
I heard people arguing about emotions
No, she's just an apologist of the greatest order.
I've only had a confrontation with her once over Islam. Typical apologist stuff was said.
Islam is poison
Such as "You're a racist." "Religion of peace." "Oppressed minority"
**Desertpirate#5228** was cleansed from the server.
DesertPirate got gassed
Islam needs to be reformed. Every religion has been violent at some point in history. Usually when that civilization becomes more educated and wealthy they become less vioent and radical and more accepting of other beliefs.
We're in the mids of pretty damming culture war tbh
I think it helps to know a bit more about the different sects
up arrow key allows you to edit posts
its much easier for a normalfag to rail against salafi islam than "islam" in general
The absolute mad man
and it makes more sense too since some branches are more radical than others
belief in an organized religion is stupid enough but a dark ages death and rape cult?
fukkin hell man its [the current year]
europe is doomed
religion isnt going anywhere
you have literally the worst takes
how is organized religion any different than government?
>religion isnt going anywhere
stupid people will be with us for a long time
does the belief in god truly make you stupid? perhaps it's a coping mechanism for humans in troubling times?
I thought the sargon discord would at least be familiar with jordan peterson
organized religion scares you into behaving with threats of hell and government scares you into behaving with threats of jail
There are better Gods to have faith in that fucking Allah.
you think people behaving is a bad thing?
i dont recall saying that
i have watched JBP's maps of meaning, personalities and its transformations and his biblical series
you should look up jonathan haidt
saw his ted talk
the righteous mind is a good book
Is this debate in a voice channel or just chat?
well yo ushould be impressed
no one on VC
or dig deeper into his stuff
I don't think there is a debate
your fedora take on religion is juvenile
its a conversation
agreed. You seem like another pompous atheist who believes he's better for his beliefs
sorry this is probably a better haidt video for the discussion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQ192d4c4S0
your belief that my comments here are the totality of my ideas is facile
I'm down for a conversation, what's the premise?
well to even say those things reflects a flawed worldview
what type of religion would you rather have?
your opinion is noted
each person following their own?
Oh lame, not a very fun topic
The little profile picture in the tweet is from Mogg
i have no preference... faith is a gift i have yet to recieve
He is a troll
so it's better for society to have remain unorganized by religious leaders. Imagine how much that would have stifled human progress.
yes because the christian dark ages was so progressive
the church was the center of medieval intellectual life
i dont care if people believe in supernatural stuff... and i believe the precepts of judeo-christianity as the base for western civilisation was and continues to be the best ethos in which to operate.... and islam is evil
The idea that Christianity caused or significantly contributed to the fall of the Western Empire has long since been rejected by modern historians.
The cause of this "Dark Age" was the collapse of the Western Roman Empire and the waves of invasions and raiding that followed it.
so where does shitting on "orgnaized religion" come from if you acknowledge all of that?
I'm guessing you're a teenager or a juvenile cynical adult
chaotic I've actually met quite a few old hippies who have that view
churches have purpetrated some of the most vile evils in history and the Bible itself as a creation of the council of nicea to placate pagans and jews was a terrible hoax
it was pretty radical in their time so they still think its mind blowing to the people they tell
there is no such thing as good or evil only human survival.
thus spake chaoticoverview
thus spake shadow the hedgehog
7am time to go to bed
Define waste of time
define correctly sized anus
Alright so suppose you have the answers to society all figured out. how do you make everyone else go along with it?
no one does. If they did they'd be doing it
you expel anyone who doesn't agree 100% with you and try to ruin their lives
Violence generally right?
oppression stifles productivity though and leads to revolt
can i ask sth
if that was true we would still be practicing slavery
Can;t revolt if you're dead
can't kill everyone
hi birdfaggot make your point
Can't control everyone either
That's why freedom of choice is the most important factor in a society
aka WHAT IF THE CHILD CONSENTS
so choice ultimately
or revolt insues
you guys are trying to distill complex structures and processes into a single principle
Depends, segregate, let people choose what nightmare to live under
it really betrays an autistic need for order and clean answers
more choice the better
okay. freedom of choice is one part of the complex structure of a highly functioning society
I'm trying to avoid a one size fits all actually. I'm not happy with just one society
if you want a fundamental structure from which to base an ideology on autistically, it's humans as a social animal
do you really want me to go into every detail of such a complex system?
no I don't
there is no one society?
any theory that doesnt start from there or acknowledge it is inadequate
libertarianism in particular is bad at coping with the fact
If anything is certain to me, It's that their should not be just one society, or one authority on morality and social structure. let people choose facism, let others choose anarchy, yada yada.
Not that it will expel violence, it would just allow for choice
Violence wont ever be expelled
Segregation of such societies of course
fascism is not compatible with a free society just as anarchy is not compatible with an authoriative society
Yes that's why we cannot have one society
it would also lead to constant warfare
But one society, or structure would lead to warfare regardless
there is no one society
**Alakazam#4383** was cleansed from the server.
I know, but that's the goal for many
they want to fix the world
then let them fix it. If it brings peace and prosperity across the globe then why fight it?
Because it wont
It's flawed to think you can change everyones minds
some people want fascism, some want liberty
some want islam
very few actually want fascism
are you of the belief you can convince them of that?
educating children is the key to changing society for the better
I don;t need to convince anyone of anthing
You'll just indoctrinate?
I just need the ignorant to send their kids to school. If it's free most will do so. Essentially yes. For the betterment of society.
Ah. Well you'll get what you're after, if you control the educating that's
however. Indoctrination isn't quite right. I would want to teach them critical thinking skills
I'm going to teach my boy critical thinking too.
That's the plan
I understand. rationally if you're right, they would believe what's educating, and you would not fear the critical, as you believe you hold the truth.
good on you Valty
I hate the idea of indoctrinating children, regardless what it is.
Let them decide for themselves.
Exactly. and yes some will slip through the cracks and take mein kampf seriously but most won't
in theory yes
Schools are known for indoctrination too though, so I'm prepared to balance out any bullshit he's taught.
Well, if some universal truth does exist for a better society, the children and the right education would be the path to finding out
the modern education system doesn't teach any real valuable skills other than reading and writing
that's my belief
I was going to type math but got lazy lol
getting tired but enjoying convo
But it's also possible the only truth from teaching rationale well to the youth, is that much of a "better society" depends on the goals you have for life, and life goals are irrational, by that all will fade to nothing. so we can take that and assume lifes meaning and therefore purpose will differ, and so opinions on a better society will very so greatly between collectivism, individualism, materialism, spiritualism. we'll even with well rational children (not indoctrinated) will cause conflict
and warfare will continue
It's my belief such differences will not easily go away, and so if "better society" is one without warfare. your best bet is indoctrination and total control
at least if it's not spiritual
Those differences in beliefs are fine and you can vote democratically for those values but in a system with many checks and balances it's going to be difficult to have it be dominated by one general ideology and will more likely become a complex system that incorporates many different ideas and over time the one's that work will stay and the one's that don't will be removed.
Define work. less violent? more productive? closer to god?
it depends. For example we know that the separation of religion and state is necessary because without that freedom of religion couldn't exist for the minor religions. We know that the right to bear arms is necessary to protect the right to freedom of speech. We know freedom of speech is valuable because it keeps society from suppressing ideas that could potentially better humanity, etc.
**Aodhan#5253** was cleansed from the server.
true, they all share a common relationship, expression, or the will to express. or better the right to conflict
one way or the other, we want the right to rebel, to object
It's so of my belief this is the problem, many want to avoid creating conflict, or believe a better society is a peaceful one or one devoid of conflict/violence
now violence always leads people to lend their mind to the worst of thoughts
but think sport as an example
the Olympics are perhaps humanities best global achievement in my mind, something so silly as sports
but nonetheless it symbolizes finding ways to fight out differences and find peace through violence
Or to assert dominance by saying we produce better people than you and advertize people to come to your better country
Look at this guy he runs fast, if you were in our country this guy would be winning for you
Right, also is a good way to settle an argument. not all arguments but it does help some
I guess where I like to go with this thinking is that violence is so overlooked on the importance it leads in a healthy society, to test your society against another. war is after all quite productive in many ways. but if society could find ways to compete without its most uneducated form, being that of destroying the other proves I'm right argument. we might actually start to see the path to universal truth is ironically mixed in with what we perceive as the worst argument you can make, that of "shutup or ill shut you up"
so western culture > third world
debating in itself can be a form of warfare. why would anyone want to rid a society of such things?
want to bring importance to this
if a server wants to survive gotta recognize debating is a form of warfare
Society as a hole mate.
conflict is the path of progress, I don't want to rid the world of my enemies, no, you'll never rid yourself of enemies, nobody is ultimately alike, and no one goal will satisfy. so a society that has not embraced this cannot survive.
Better to segregate and give people the option to move to their desired hell imo
i dunno m8
i got 5 bans in 2 hours
im just an anarchist
i just wanna deffend my family and friends from everyone els
what's up fascistanis contrapoints btfo sargon
kewl story bro
there's more than 2 genders debate me
Depends, do I have to abide by how many genders one person believes to another? or is it scientific? even so, can we agree to disagree?
or should we just fight it out and whoever survives wins?
gender in itself isn't entirely scientific
**qtwinkieboy#1999** was cleansed from the server.
no you don't have to abide by what someone wants
it's just rude
okay, I'll be rude then, as it makes it simpler on my small brain
lurk lurk lurk
and u gonna get me
names are complicated enough
deal with it
pol people dont lurk anymore
cause trolls make them think they get it
internet culture is deep
It it the intention that makes one rude? or the lack of abiding to anothers wishes?
okay, If I may. I want to call people boy and girl because it's easy on my small brain, would this be acceptable?
if you really are such a brainlet I guess so
That's great, easy enough for me
you can believe in as many genders as you wish then
it's the telling me what to think part. I have trouble with
you can understand
gender in itself is about belief
right, how would I deal with someone who gets offended by me calling them a girl? when my intention was simple minded (they looked like what I perceive as a girl) but nonetheless they are offended
Oh thats a spicy edit
how does one navagate those waters without being offended themselves? (respecting my simple mind)
just say sorry I'm a retard