To balance things.

I'd expect that honestly

On the other hand

it could be a genuine position taken out of a reaction to a bad thing: hedonistic consumerism. The thing is, ascetic renunciation is also a bad thing.

https://twitter.com/BumblingUSA/status/785813802960891904

A reason why metal sucks now is that artists step into the studio to "make metal" . More specifically, a type of metal. It's about the concept now rather than the sensation. Every new development prior was precipitated by the rejection of some earlier concept in favor of concrete sensations with little mind of what exactly to call it. The press and labels just sell the concept to people, it's almost always been this way. There are few if any musicians in metal interested purely in musical sensation, it's always a goal to work within some concept that already exists.

https://theroperreportsite.wordpress.com/2017/04/11/how-the-alt-right-promotes-hatred-of-white-women-and-eurasianism/

the surface took over from the substance

@fallot ^

and it's imitative instead of pioneering

That's because there is little substance left to be mined out of the ground that hasn't already been covered. At least in an economical sense.

maybe

i think there's plenty of ground left

but it would require going into new topics

keeping the metal outlook

you're talking lyrics and themes right

I mean are there really any other "metal" sensations left that relate to the metal Outlook that haven't been covered

No I mean strictly musical

That ineffable feeling

That evades description

New topics won't help because those topics would be presented in a way that's already rounded out. So you'd just be shoving more instances into an essence that's tapped out

i think so but i have no evidence either way

@devolved HELLO

@vigil#3835 METAL IS DALIT

hiya

@vigil#3835 AND SO ARE U BECAUSE UR TAG DOESN'T WORK

@devolved WHAT DO YOU THINK OF JARED KUSHNER?

IS HE GRIMA WORMTONGUE?

Well then I'll stick to my view

IF SO, DOES HE HOLD ANY LESSONS ON WHAT SHOULD BE DONE TO JEWS IN RIGHT WING MOVEMENTS?

WHAT ARE THOSE LESSONS?

gasjews

SEAN SPICER IS MORE LIT THAN IS BERT

SEAN SPICER KNOWS HITLER DID NOT USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS

BERT STEVENS PROMOTES THE HOLOCAUST

<:yehuda:286647952569532417>

@Deleted User 57835c2c https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2017/04/12/twin-falls-idaho-mormon-boy-scout-troop-being-used-to-promote-more-refugees/

FUTURE MEMBERS OF THIS CHAT

THE REFUGEES

NOT THE SCOUTS

The priestly caste is the one which got deformed first

Perhaps it is a historical force, a necessity of the positiion of one who is for prolonged time

Separated from the plane of combat

What concerns me most

Are the recent calls for eugenical promotion of the purification of the "race"

recent?

I was at first completely on board, but later I noticed certain self-indulging patterns in this thought (moderns cannot take any concept without missinterpreting it to the extremes)

Yes, I mean ressurgence of it

Initially the idea of promoting eugenics in order to eliminate hereditary deformations and remove one important source of indulgence for all the charities, servile nuns, virtue signalers etc

But then again, spiritual deformities of the principal protagonists started surfacing

And in the whole idea, i started recognizing the good old Western pathologies

Namely

1. Western fascination with medicine

2. Western fascinaiton with all aesthetical forms related to medicine and inspired by medical outlook, namely, sterile, clinical and formal

3. Western fascination with the most material aspects of science

4. Western conformity and desire to bring about an entirely conformist utopia

5. And I must unfortunately add, Western sexual perversion and desire to bring about the wold of the most sexually desirable people possible

With these things in mind, the Westerner does not want to promot eugenics as one among many other tools which could potentially remove certain trivialities

But he sees eugenicism as an ideal, and promotion of it, as a core purpose of life, and a cornerstone of any future society

therefore, at the center of the future society would lie

an enormous burreaucratic apparatus of doctors

to fulfill the western desire to be ruled by Doctors and medical workers

Which would then systematically eliminate certain genetic strains

According to sensibilities of fashon models and football players

@The Enlightened Shepherd I agree, Lebensborns are the counterparts of LGBT, destroy the family, serve the collective

So that the future race could be as sexually pleasing to the average football player and fashion model

From which they presume, society would emerge "superior"

Because they also presume, intelligence is directly measured by levels of conformity to the formal society and it's demands

Hence, via marvelous eugenic efforts

We would finnally usher in a new era, of dumb football playes and fashion models, all blonde, tall, with slender faces

Who would all equally be perfectly in line with the arithmetically defined "standards" through which doctors would organize society

And it isn't hard to predict the population would also be completely surgically removed from any higher tastes

end bureaucracy

As well as any measure of subtlety

This would be the perfect race of the eugenicist future. A nation of the protagonists of Police Crime dramas, all sterile, all tasteless, all perfect, but also, all perfectly peasants

why would they be peasants

peasant is a derogatory term for people with provincial sensibilities, people lacking higher and refined tastes

the less the person resembles an agricultural worker, the more powerful it is

Peasant = "pleb"

Which there is nothing wrong with.

not exactly, there is an important difference

Economic?

why would they be unable to have higher sensibilities

in theory that facility is mostly genetic itself

How can anything which is concoted in an office have any measure of it ?

peasants don't count

that's the point

You people forget that people exist within a society, and it's realities they assume as a part of their identity

What kind of measure for anything subtle can have anybody who is born in a socitey of "perfectly measured" individuals

Which absolutely implies people tailored to be the same

Which then again implies, people who are slowly conforming to one and the same ideal, which simply has to be perverted

On a long enough timeline

As anything that gets formalized in a burreaucratic fashion does

true

so the problem is bureaucracy

not eugenics

What is a higher sensibility​

vigil, with that nihilistic pettifogging you will not reach a much more sophisticated conclusion than "sodomize the weak"

and though we use it as a joke

REKT