Message from @devolved
Discord ID: 301770705123672064
Which would then systematically eliminate certain genetic strains
According to sensibilities of fashon models and football players
@The Enlightened Shepherd I agree, Lebensborns are the counterparts of LGBT, destroy the family, serve the collective
So that the future race could be as sexually pleasing to the average football player and fashion model
From which they presume, society would emerge "superior"
Because they also presume, intelligence is directly measured by levels of conformity to the formal society and it's demands
Hence, via marvelous eugenic efforts
We would finnally usher in a new era, of dumb football playes and fashion models, all blonde, tall, with slender faces
Who would all equally be perfectly in line with the arithmetically defined "standards" through which doctors would organize society
And it isn't hard to predict the population would also be completely surgically removed from any higher tastes
end bureaucracy
As well as any measure of subtlety
This would be the perfect race of the eugenicist future. A nation of the protagonists of Police Crime dramas, all sterile, all tasteless, all perfect, but also, all perfectly peasants
why would they be peasants
peasant is a derogatory term for people with provincial sensibilities, people lacking higher and refined tastes
the less the person resembles an agricultural worker, the more powerful it is
Peasant = "pleb"
Which there is nothing wrong with.
not exactly, there is an important difference
Economic?
in theory that facility is mostly genetic itself
How can anything which is concoted in an office have any measure of it ?
peasants don't count
that's the point
You people forget that people exist within a society, and it's realities they assume as a part of their identity
What kind of measure for anything subtle can have anybody who is born in a socitey of "perfectly measured" individuals
Which absolutely implies people tailored to be the same
Which then again implies, people who are slowly conforming to one and the same ideal, which simply has to be perverted
On a long enough timeline
As anything that gets formalized in a burreaucratic fashion does
true
so the problem is bureaucracy
not eugenics
What is a higher sensibility
vigil, with that nihilistic pettifogging you will not reach a much more sophisticated conclusion than "sodomize the weak"
and though we use it as a joke
REKT
sodomize the weak, when understood quite literallzy, is a bad philosophz
especially for somebody who belongs to a generation of the weak
I think sodomize the weak is boring