Message from @The Enlightened Shepherd
Discord ID: 301771923552206850
And it isn't hard to predict the population would also be completely surgically removed from any higher tastes
end bureaucracy
As well as any measure of subtlety
This would be the perfect race of the eugenicist future. A nation of the protagonists of Police Crime dramas, all sterile, all tasteless, all perfect, but also, all perfectly peasants
why would they be peasants
peasant is a derogatory term for people with provincial sensibilities, people lacking higher and refined tastes
the less the person resembles an agricultural worker, the more powerful it is
Peasant = "pleb"
Which there is nothing wrong with.
not exactly, there is an important difference
Economic?
why would they be unable to have higher sensibilities
in theory that facility is mostly genetic itself
How can anything which is concoted in an office have any measure of it ?
peasants don't count
that's the point
You people forget that people exist within a society, and it's realities they assume as a part of their identity
What kind of measure for anything subtle can have anybody who is born in a socitey of "perfectly measured" individuals
Which absolutely implies people tailored to be the same
Which then again implies, people who are slowly conforming to one and the same ideal, which simply has to be perverted
As anything that gets formalized in a burreaucratic fashion does
true
so the problem is bureaucracy
not eugenics
What is a higher sensibility
vigil, with that nihilistic pettifogging you will not reach a much more sophisticated conclusion than "sodomize the weak"
and though we use it as a joke
REKT
sodomize the weak, when understood quite literallzy, is a bad philosophz
especially for somebody who belongs to a generation of the weak
I think sodomize the weak is boring
I just want to know what a higher sensibility is
whichever rises above the sensibilities of the undifferentiated mass
So you're just leading the definition
You can change what constitutes higher sensibility at the drop of a hat
why yes of course
and a gentleman in a 500$ suit will write down the definition, put it in a file and shelve it
so nothing can be suspected of being irrational
what else should a rational society do ?
if we cannot make a consensus about it = it doesnt exist