Message from @devolved

Discord ID: 301770784777699329


2017-04-12 17:20:47 UTC  

According to sensibilities of fashon models and football players

2017-04-12 17:20:56 UTC  

@The Enlightened Shepherd I agree, Lebensborns are the counterparts of LGBT, destroy the family, serve the collective

2017-04-12 17:21:20 UTC  

So that the future race could be as sexually pleasing to the average football player and fashion model

2017-04-12 17:21:30 UTC  

From which they presume, society would emerge "superior"

2017-04-12 17:21:50 UTC  

Because they also presume, intelligence is directly measured by levels of conformity to the formal society and it's demands

2017-04-12 17:22:05 UTC  

Hence, via marvelous eugenic efforts

2017-04-12 17:22:32 UTC  

We would finnally usher in a new era, of dumb football playes and fashion models, all blonde, tall, with slender faces

2017-04-12 17:22:57 UTC  

Who would all equally be perfectly in line with the arithmetically defined "standards" through which doctors would organize society

2017-04-12 17:23:19 UTC  

And it isn't hard to predict the population would also be completely surgically removed from any higher tastes

2017-04-12 17:23:26 UTC  

end bureaucracy

2017-04-12 17:23:28 UTC  

As well as any measure of subtlety

2017-04-12 17:24:19 UTC  

This would be the perfect race of the eugenicist future. A nation of the protagonists of Police Crime dramas, all sterile, all tasteless, all perfect, but also, all perfectly peasants

2017-04-12 17:25:16 UTC  

why would they be peasants

2017-04-12 17:26:17 UTC  

peasant is a derogatory term for people with provincial sensibilities, people lacking higher and refined tastes

2017-04-12 17:26:30 UTC  

the less the person resembles an agricultural worker, the more powerful it is

2017-04-12 17:27:58 UTC  

Peasant = "pleb"

2017-04-12 17:28:13 UTC  

Which there is nothing wrong with.

2017-04-12 17:28:21 UTC  

not exactly, there is an important difference

2017-04-12 17:28:34 UTC  

Economic?

2017-04-12 17:29:02 UTC  

why would they be unable to have higher sensibilities

2017-04-12 17:29:21 UTC  

in theory that facility is mostly genetic itself

2017-04-12 17:31:48 UTC  

How can anything which is concoted in an office have any measure of it ?

2017-04-12 17:31:54 UTC  

peasants don't count

2017-04-12 17:31:56 UTC  

that's the point

2017-04-12 17:32:36 UTC  

You people forget that people exist within a society, and it's realities they assume as a part of their identity

2017-04-12 17:33:09 UTC  

What kind of measure for anything subtle can have anybody who is born in a socitey of "perfectly measured" individuals

2017-04-12 17:33:16 UTC  

Which absolutely implies people tailored to be the same

2017-04-12 17:33:48 UTC  

Which then again implies, people who are slowly conforming to one and the same ideal, which simply has to be perverted

2017-04-12 17:33:53 UTC  

On a long enough timeline

2017-04-12 17:34:03 UTC  

As anything that gets formalized in a burreaucratic fashion does

2017-04-12 17:39:56 UTC  

true

2017-04-12 17:40:10 UTC  

so the problem is bureaucracy

2017-04-12 17:40:19 UTC  

not eugenics

2017-04-12 17:41:15 UTC  

What is a higher sensibility​

2017-04-12 17:42:07 UTC  

vigil, with that nihilistic pettifogging you will not reach a much more sophisticated conclusion than "sodomize the weak"

2017-04-12 17:42:11 UTC  

and though we use it as a joke

2017-04-12 17:42:18 UTC  

REKT

2017-04-12 17:42:28 UTC  

sodomize the weak, when understood quite literallzy, is a bad philosophz

2017-04-12 17:42:38 UTC  

especially for somebody who belongs to a generation of the weak

2017-04-12 17:42:46 UTC  

I think sodomize the weak is boring

2017-04-12 17:42:59 UTC  

I just want to know what a higher sensibility is