we cant do shit about it really, but its nearly impossible to ignore

Epic lefty troll tho

Well the Right wing party are rising up

wow you are triggered

like the AFD

Says the right is racist and then says I like Iran Omar because she hates Jews

the big fat elephant is getting fatter

Go AFD

AFD

They got a pretty neat history tbh

AFD

george washington was right <:peepobad:538084182644228112>

he was

i hate who i want bitch

good ole wise red-head

ok so

youre a hypocrite then

right?

Complains about hatred from the right and then says I hate who I want bytch

zionists are different

.

so supporting jews is bad?

The elephant came from the reference used in war “seeing the elephant” used to express seeing war so Abraham used that

mhm

like slavers didnt say the same about black people, or like eugenics did

so...

<:lol:583236542580129825>

but the right hates the jews too, the nazis and KKK always have anti jew hate rallies

<:lies:591248716766248962>

uh no

you seem to keep forgetting who created the KKK

And the jackass from Andrew Jackson. Tbh I’m surprised it haven’t been changed since Jackson used it

that's quite a warped view

the right created the KKK

*hot take*

The donkey came from andrew jackson who killed thousands of natives, and the Elephant came from a political cartoon endorsed by the president who helped end slavery

<:milady:591248801189330944>

andrew jackson was a fucking freak

Andrew was a badass

plus his parrot tho

yes many people at that time killed thousands of natives and had slaves

his annoying ass parrot

just fucking dueled people

Natives had slaves

u guys wanna vc

nah

Was it Andrew that got shot and then reloaded his gun and killed the guy

and andrew jackson is on your money

I'll brb, going to store then vc @Vojnik

Abe lincon is also on our money

yeah, andrew jackson had many gun duels and attempts on his life

Washington is also on money

dam

lincoln had hemp fields

And franklin

abe lincon was a republican

Hemp was good

back then it was the other way around

republicans and democrats where reversed

the union was a named used by republicans <:peepoDetective:583235938621194241>

That's another lie by the liberal media trying to say that the party switched

I heard Nixon switched it

prove that please, i dont use faith

you mean your own opinion

There's entire explanations on how the parties did not switch

PragerU has a video on it

Yup

I haven’t watched it tho

ooo

prauge

I've always wanted to go there

PragerU isn't exactly an optimal source to me

did you know that both parties used blue until the cold war

Like some of their videos are good and other are just *super* biased

Yea some people hate pragerU

I mean I don't mind people having opinions like Prager

They don't necessarily put themselves out to be a nonpartisan outfit

I mean I don't hate it but I usually refrain from citing it myself

Yeah but I mean if the information is true about the parties not switching

I don’t no any not biased media tbh

That's the other point I was going to bring up is what are we get our information from shouldn't matter

Since they're going to cite CNN and Daily Beast

And Vox

Etcetera

Independent media has some sources, like usually Tim Pool is good about keeping bias out

I think Shapiro is a good source even tho he is biased

GG @americann_son, you just advanced to level 2!

Though these guys are admittedly hard to find

shapiro isnt news

Yeah I do like Tim pool I even typed a message on his YouTube channel that he saw when I told him to smile more and laugh more LOL

He owns daily wire

tim pool isnt a valid source either

Nothing is a valid source unless it's CNN related for you

Ben Shapiro is also debatable but I find him to be better than PragerU in terms of bias and evidence. Though I do tend to like his stuff.

no, you are wrong

@Deleted User r u still gonna join vc ?

It's easy to dismiss everyone's information and keep your own liberal safe space

Shapiro give everyone a chance to speak honestly he invites dems and reps and cites everything

@Vojnik yeah I'm at the store I'll be right there

good stuff

Steven Crowder is the same deal though I don't take his stuff super seriously

Of course none of these are non-partisan news organizations like CNN purports itself to be

yeah right, when i watch right wing media its easily debunked

Dave Rubin i find to be pretty good

I love crowder

When MSNBC says that it's not biased

Joe Rogan as well, his show's fucking fascinating

whats msnbc?

Every show makes a mistake

and he hosts like

literally everybody

It's CNN's after birth

never watch it

@CallMeTruckson

@Deleted User

MSNBC is probably the station that the term "fake news" would apply the most to

i can do that to

Well I tag you because you asked what MSNBC is

im msnbc, cool, im a rich fake news site

Well if you keep listening to new sources that say that they're non-partisan but have the most biased opinion hit pieces then you're just going to live in a liberal safe space for the rest of your life

imma have yo nogga ass arrested

happened to me actually

I used to be *very* left leaning

the right is the side that whines all day every day, the average veiwer is 65-70 year old demographic

https://youtu.be/SlGFzeacyr0

bruh the left has made careers out of whining

and that's only partially hyperbolic <:laugh:583238348077006869>

whining about bad things like easy access guns, republicans that rape and pollute for profit

They literally held an event to cry in the sky after Trump got elected

the right holds events for mens rights, and nobody shows up

guns are not easy to buy though

I literally don't know anybody that complains about easy access guns

in some states yes they are

Like which ones?

And the profit comes from capitalism

The United States carbon footprint is very small compared to China's

one sec

Actually a male suicide group was protested by a bunch of lefties

Well no, it's not very small it's still large in and of itself, but i think it is like half of china's, and it can be reduced greatly if we invest in nuclear

It was the video that had Lauren Southern in it and the antifa girl that shut down with the Windows XP sound

I think it said something like 15%

the 15% sounds familiar but i don't think that's what it meant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Alabama

i don't quite remember though

no need for a state permit to buy long rifle and handguns

no firarm registration needed

owner needs no license

you do need a permit for CC

but not for long rifles

has no assault weapons laws

Then I'll agree with you on this one, I think the laws should include those things

no background checks for private sales

RankCountryCarbon Emissions
1China10,641,789
2United States5,172,336
3European Union3,469,671
4India2,454,968

About half

alaska is worse, no permit for CC of handguns

ok yeah, so the US's is essentially half of China's

I think somebody's fudging China's numbers

They should be way higher

For the amount of people that are there

I think it's like for every American there's 4.2 Chinese people

The U.S. vs China population is 311.1 million to 1.34 billion

look here look listen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhDsQIFgh3E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bGqBo0fLK0

*finds trump chat, complains to non-commies about capitalism*

why did u leave like a pussy

you a whole ass bitch

youre insufferable and whiny

i literally said whats wrong with authortarianism nd then u dipped

deflection isnt debating

how was i deflecting

no thats not where it ended

now youre just making stuff up man

explain how i deflected

fuckin disgusting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxJDIk7A2vc

no it did

idk but i dont know any trumpsters that like listening to whiny commies

i thought u were open minded

nd wanted to debate new ideas nd shit

not to someone that thinks we should kill everyone

nah only ppl who r retarded i.e. ppl who disagree with me

change my mind then

like me

so thats a waste of time

understandable have a good day sir

Joint congressional statement:

The president of the United States may have used his position to pressure a foreign country into investigating a political opponent, and he sought to use U.S. taxpayer dollars as leverage to do it. He allegedly sought to use the very security assistance dollars appropriated by Congress to create stability in the world, to help root out corruption and to protect our national security interests, for his own personal gain. These allegations are stunning, both in the national security threat they pose and the potential corruption they represent. We also know that on Sept. 9, the inspector general for the intelligence community notified Congress of a “credible” and “urgent” whistleblower complaint related to national security and potentially involving these allegations. Despite federal law requiring the disclosure of this complaint to Congress, the administration has blocked its release to Congress.

If these allegations are true, we believe these actions represent an impeachable offense. We do not arrive at this conclusion lightly, and we call on our colleagues in Congress to consider the use of all congressional authorities available to us, including the power of “inherent contempt” and impeachment hearings, to address these new allegations, find the truth and protect our national security.

This congressional statement appears to be restating exactly what i have been saying the entire time.

you said trump is a criminal?

he is extorting Ukraine right now to hurt a political opponent

If the president actually used leverage to push the Ukraine then yes that is impeachable. This also does not state that this is certainly what he did, it says "may have", "allegations", and other uncertain language. Because yet again, simply asking them to look into corruption in the Ukranian's *own* government is in and of itself not impeachable.

ukraine may not get the 400 million dollars if they dont play ball

that is impeachable

You're once again taking something that's unsubstantiated as being 100% true.

extortion

"may have used his position"

@Cobra Commander lets see your debunking

"He allegedly sought to use"

"These allegations are stunning"

yes so lets have an investigation

"If these allegations are true"

we need an investigation to find the truth

you may not need to, trump's already said that he'll likely release the call transcript

of course you do <:kermit:591248635220721674>

i dont have faith in that

of course you don't <:laugh:583238348077006869>

The left is the new conspiracy theorists

<:haha:583236087137435659>

Rachel Maddow lol

"I now have Trump's tax returns from 2005 breaking news guys"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwBjnhKwuRg

DARPA makes our drones

We don't need China's shity technology

@Cobra Commander lol did you not read it?

“I don’t think it really matters … whether the president explicitly told the Ukrainians that they wouldn’t get their security aid if they didn’t interfere in the 2020 elections,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). “There is an implicit threat in every demand that a United States president makes of a foreign power. … That foreign country knows that if they don’t do it, there are likely to be consequences

There.

You traitorous dumb fuck

Actually it does matter, it literally makes or breaks it as being impeachable *according to the criteria for impeachment*

@Cobra Commander alternate facts

Well then it's just a hypothetical situation

it actually happened

He said whether the president explicitly told the ukrainians

@Cobra Commander that is not accurate. You do not understand the meaning of impeachment

Not that he did

do you?

its an underlying threat

Politicians go to other countries all the time

Like when Hillary went to Bosnia and complained about dodging sniper fire

like if this guy makes a demand you will do it

Which was totally fabricated and not true

@Deleted User but she was cleared by the proper channels, trumps son wasnt

What is the proper channels

Ones that only you agree with

Or is it something set up by the government

You're pulling your Hillary card again but you need to read the back of it

his son didnt meet the requirements for spy credentials but trump overruled that an then obstructed the investigation into it

Except the threat part is entirely unconfirmed. it literally cannot be considered a threat without being entirely arbitrary. Impeachment has to involve explicit bribery, extortion, threatening, and other high crimes. Once again, you cannot take a phone call asking another country to sort out their corruption as being impeachable, sorry United States federal law disagrees with you.

@Deleted User the FBI

Again, the threat is implicit

And is enough to be criminal

Implication

Still has to be proven

No it literally is not.

The phone call alone is enough, especially given that it was not in the purview or the executive to withhold the funds

Well, we’ll see what congress does

@Cobra Commander no, what do you think the commander in cheif will do if he doesnt comply? refrain from the aid package

No it isn't.

If they impeach, then it’s impeachable

Yeah I was going to say we don't decide

Yes, it is.