Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 625878466377809938
<:haha:583236087137435659>
Rachel Maddow lol
"I now have Trump's tax returns from 2005 breaking news guys"
DARPA makes our drones
We don't need China's shity technology
@Cobra Commander lol did you not read it?
“I don’t think it really matters … whether the president explicitly told the Ukrainians that they wouldn’t get their security aid if they didn’t interfere in the 2020 elections,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). “There is an implicit threat in every demand that a United States president makes of a foreign power. … That foreign country knows that if they don’t do it, there are likely to be consequences
There.
You traitorous dumb fuck
Actually it does matter, it literally makes or breaks it as being impeachable *according to the criteria for impeachment*
@Cobra Commander alternate facts
Well then it's just a hypothetical situation
it actually happened
He said whether the president explicitly told the ukrainians
@Cobra Commander that is not accurate. You do not understand the meaning of impeachment
Not that he did
do you?
its an underlying threat
Politicians go to other countries all the time
like if this guy makes a demand you will do it
Which was totally fabricated and not true
@Deleted User but she was cleared by the proper channels, trumps son wasnt
What is the proper channels
Ones that only you agree with
Or is it something set up by the government
You're pulling your Hillary card again but you need to read the back of it
his son didnt meet the requirements for spy credentials but trump overruled that an then obstructed the investigation into it
Except the threat part is entirely unconfirmed. it literally cannot be considered a threat without being entirely arbitrary. Impeachment has to involve explicit bribery, extortion, threatening, and other high crimes. Once again, you cannot take a phone call asking another country to sort out their corruption as being impeachable, sorry United States federal law disagrees with you.
@Deleted User the FBI
Again, the threat is implicit
And is enough to be criminal
Implication
Still has to be proven
No it literally is not.
The phone call alone is enough, especially given that it was not in the purview or the executive to withhold the funds
Well, we’ll see what congress does
@Cobra Commander no, what do you think the commander in cheif will do if he doesnt comply? refrain from the aid package
No it isn't.
If they impeach, then it’s impeachable