of course you do <:kermit:591248635220721674>

i dont have faith in that

of course you don't <:laugh:583238348077006869>

The left is the new conspiracy theorists

<:haha:583236087137435659>

Rachel Maddow lol

"I now have Trump's tax returns from 2005 breaking news guys"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwBjnhKwuRg

DARPA makes our drones

We don't need China's shity technology

@Cobra Commander lol did you not read it?

“I don’t think it really matters … whether the president explicitly told the Ukrainians that they wouldn’t get their security aid if they didn’t interfere in the 2020 elections,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). “There is an implicit threat in every demand that a United States president makes of a foreign power. … That foreign country knows that if they don’t do it, there are likely to be consequences

There.

You traitorous dumb fuck

Actually it does matter, it literally makes or breaks it as being impeachable *according to the criteria for impeachment*

@Cobra Commander alternate facts

Well then it's just a hypothetical situation

it actually happened

He said whether the president explicitly told the ukrainians

@Cobra Commander that is not accurate. You do not understand the meaning of impeachment

Not that he did

do you?

its an underlying threat

Politicians go to other countries all the time

Like when Hillary went to Bosnia and complained about dodging sniper fire

like if this guy makes a demand you will do it

Which was totally fabricated and not true

@Deleted User but she was cleared by the proper channels, trumps son wasnt

What is the proper channels

Ones that only you agree with

Or is it something set up by the government

You're pulling your Hillary card again but you need to read the back of it

his son didnt meet the requirements for spy credentials but trump overruled that an then obstructed the investigation into it

Except the threat part is entirely unconfirmed. it literally cannot be considered a threat without being entirely arbitrary. Impeachment has to involve explicit bribery, extortion, threatening, and other high crimes. Once again, you cannot take a phone call asking another country to sort out their corruption as being impeachable, sorry United States federal law disagrees with you.

@Deleted User the FBI

Again, the threat is implicit

And is enough to be criminal

Implication

Still has to be proven

No it literally is not.

The phone call alone is enough, especially given that it was not in the purview or the executive to withhold the funds