Nope

Same video I think

They never said that.

Not even once. And if they did, That would be in the police report

But it's not. Because they never said it

Ok nvm I watched it again he said "If he reaches for it"

I'll admit I remembered that wrong

👍

👏👏👏

Even then though 6 police officers and one guy who had just woken up they didn't need to shoot him 25+ times

Great job admitting that. Couldn't been easy for ya

Regardless of if he "reached for it"

No it was easy for me because I'm not as thick as you're assuming

Well police officers will shoot about 5 or 6 times each and with 6 officers there that's plenty per cop

When adrenaline rushes no matter what training you have shit gets real real quick

When there are 6 officers there and the guy hasn't even put his hand on the gun yet and you planned previously to shoot him if he even reached for it and you're not at all in danger it's completely unjustified to shoot him 5 times

Nope

Even just the fact they pointed their guns at him before he woke up showed they were planning to shoot him before he even reached for the gun

When he simply had it in his car

That's their training to shoot the person 5 times and everyone of them did it

Like what the fuck happened to this guy's second amendment rights

It's their training to shoot a guy who just woke up and isn't even holding a weapon, just has one in his car, over 5 times?

If it is that's fucked up and you need to sort out your fucking country

Regardless of whether the guy's black or not

Wait are you even American?

He was a convicted felon. So he shouldn't have a gun from the beginning

No prejudice or anything I just wanna know

Nope British

@GeT_DuCkT true

Ah ok

Ok I watched the video again, from what I could see before he woke up he scratched his shoulder and when he woke up he leant forward

The gun was supposedly on the chair next to him

It was on his lap

Ok yup nvm on his lap I didn't read the text that went with the video

Still though

That dosen't invalidate the point that leaning forward isn't the same as reaching for the gun

He just sat up after waking up

Is this the story about the guy who was asleep in a taco bell drive through?

If you're trying to tell me that shooting him 25+ times in that scenario is justified then there's something wrong with you

Yup @michael

Okay the first fact I noticed is that the family believes he was struck 20 times?

has that been confirmed or is that just the family speculation?

The cops have the right to do so. They get nervous when people have guns. Even when they are licensed to have them.

No it's been confirmed

Do you guys have a source youre going off of?

So being nervous is reason to shoot someone 25+ times????

Because the source im reading says its speculation

It can be yes

No its fucking not

How

Stand in the officers shoes

They see more shit then you will ever see

I'm in the officers shoes

There's a guy asleep in his car

There's 5 other guys there

Sure he has a gun on his lap but all 6 of us have guns

He wakes up and sits up, dosen't reach for the gun from what I can see.

We shoot him 25 times

"Police said he was given "several commands" to put his hands up, but he did not comply and appeared to "quickly" move his hands down to the firearm."

thats a quote

From what

im not taking a side

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/california-rapper-sleeping-car-killed-police-who-opened-fire-n971241

I couldn't see that in the video

No you not in the officers shoes. You want to know Why. You're. Not. A. Officer. Neither am I. But when cops give orders. You follow them. Disobey there will be repercussions.

I'm not sure about you but I'd rather disobey orders and face repercussions than shoot a guy 25+ times for no good reason

Giving orders and not following them and reaching for the gun isnt a reason

It was multiple cops shooting him correct?

GG @michael, you just advanced to level 1!

not just one man pumping him full of led?

It was 6 of them shooting him as far as I know

@The Lemon jeeze you're fucked in the head.

I literally watched the video, from what you can see he dosen't reach for the gun

Videos can be edited to someones liking

The media does it all the time

Not that realistically

It'd be obvious if it was edited

Yes that realistically. And it wouldn't. We are talking multimillion dollar media outlets

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 2!

https://twitter.com/sahluwal/status/1112363221879418880

There's the footage if you want to judge it for yourself

THATS CLEARLY EDITED. THERE IS A MOMENT INBETWEEN THE FIRING THAT STARTS WHERE THE DUDE LEANS FORWARD TO POSSIBLY GRAB THE GUN. THATS WHY THEY DID IT

THERE IS ALSO WITH THAT EDITED FOOTAGE THERES ALOT MISSING

I already acknowledged that he leaned forward, that's different from leaning for the gun

It shows the moment he wakes up which is the important bit

I realise it cut part out retard I already said that too

I mean, I don’t particularly like the police or the military, they’re really just ZOG-bots, especially the police. But within the United States, there is no police conspiracy against black people lol, if that’s what your getting at.

I'm not saying there is

I'm just saying this killing was completely unjustified

Hell, more white people are actually killed by the police, so the police would be more anti-white than anything else.

He looked awake when I saw him lean forward. His eyes were even open when he did so.

Who falls asleep in a drive threw?

With a gun in their lap

I honestly don’t care if the police killed a non-white that acted in that manner.

The cops tried waking him up before hand.

@Deleted User I know he was awake

But again, leaning forward is different from reaching for the gun

Leaning forward isnt the first thing to you do when the guns are pulled out

Everyone should know that

@Deleted User You also say that they kill more white people but white people make up a far larger proportion of the population