You haven’t even read the whole article yet, so what’s the point in this entire conversation?

Why deny me my right to live in all white communities?

The point with the conversation is that I didn't even have to read more than a fifth of the article to see that whoever wrote it clearly has no understanding of statistics or how to handle data and misinterprets it to make disingenuous claims that can lead to far right radicalisation

Who said you had a right to live in an all white community?

Do I have freedom of association?

If you deny others the right to live in the community that you live in based on their skin colour that's treading on their rights

jesus

What do you even mean by freedom of association

That could be interpreted in so many different ways

If you mean freedom to interact with only the people that you want to interact with then no you do not have freedom of association and neither does anyone else because it would be unimaginably impractical to ensure that nobody ever interacts with anyone that they don't want to interact with and its not a human right to be wrapped up in your little nationalistic alt right echo chamber like the intolerant little crybaby snowflake you are

Why not just drop the last conversation since according to you I’m not doing work to prove that mixed race children are inferior to non-mixed race children and you’re not even bothering to read either in its entirety.

So if I’m denied access to gay nightclub/bar because I’m straight. Is that not treading on my rights? By freedom of association in a Liberal society I mean that I have the freedom to interact with whomever I please and form communities socially and physically with those people and for those people alone. And within our community, we have the freedom to come and go as we please but those entering must not impeach our freedom by not being the demographic that the community desires to associate with.

Generally straight people aren't denies access to gay bars...

So why should you force me to associate with people I don’t want to when you obviously don’t want to associate with people like myself within your community?

Anyway I need to get on with other stuff cya

It’s happened before though.

Sure you do.

Well I mean unlike you seemingly I have a life outside of discord politics servers

If you want to know something more specific I have exams coming up and need to revise for them

So fuck you, I'm off

Pick a line, us ultranationalists are either basement dwelling incels or violent AtomWaffen mass murders?

I mean

he does have a point Casper.

People can have lives outside of Discord <:kek:538084230408830987>

You were the one that sperged out earlier about me making a pre-judgement about you. And now you’re doing the same thing to me. Are you aware of what a pre-judgment is? It’s a prejudice. I can’t believe a member of the tolerant left would be prejudice.

I work out, get good grades, and I have a cute blonde fashy gf. Is that not a life outside of Discord? Besides I haven’t been active on here for awhile anyway.

Oh man

Battle of the memes right here.

Why can’t I say the N word?

N i g g le t

@LING LING Because you're asian.

O

:>

Zipperhead

the hell ^ that wasnt deleted

“Racial inequality” my ass

N i g g e r

Radical equality is a Marxist fantasy uwu

Hah

Yes

Asians r mean though

U almost starved my Great Uncle to death by using bully camps

I mean we’re just having grilled pitbulls

And he had no White male bully hunters to save him😏

Ur grandpa thought it was inhumane

Have a pitbull and sit down

Why are black people acting like they're being killed by the cop for "no reason at all" ??

I would shot A pitbull

@LING LING

Libertarian and nationalist

Lol

I¨have never killed a black

yet

Based

I guess he has not met any annoying blacks yet

@GeT_DuCkT There was a guy who got shot in his car while asleep with a gun next to him. The cops knew he was asleep (you hear them acknowledge it in the body cam footage), as soon as he wakes up they shoot him about 10 times. I'm not saying this is a problem with all cops or this kind of thing is the case in every scenario but its disingenuous to say its always justified when they get shot by police.

@The Lemon if you looked at the video they wake him up and were trying to get the weapons off his lap but he woke up and reached over to where the gun was and that was when the cops took action and discharged their weapons because he was reaching twords the weapon

**Actually, He reached for the gun when he was "sleeping" and they didn't shoot.** @The Lemon

@America_Chan I've watched the video and there was no indication he reached for the gun and one of the officers said he wanted to shoot the guy if we woke up

Stop bullshitting and assuming I haven't acc watched the video

So you all are saying that every cop that has shoot a black person has said to themselves "He's black. Lets shoot him"

No

I literally said that wasn't what I was saying in my original message

No if you looked closely you could see him move his arm over to the gun and that's when they took action (It's hard to see but he did) @The Lemon

Read what I say before trying to argue against me next time retard

Sure he did... You could barely even see him in the video let alone the gun I highly doubt you could see him reach for it

Bro

Sorry. Didn't see you were a feminist.

Dear non-binary female
Please don't assume I'm retarded because of 1 message. Thank you

Look at my other tags, I'm not a fucking SJW

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL07ZeGstP8&t

100% Breakdown.

If there is a gun sitting on the chest of a sketchy guy sleeping in a parking lot I would shot the packer as well

He also reached for the weapon when he woke up lol

6 cops against one guy and they shoot him over 25 times

Wow sounds like they were soooo threatened

He reached for it like twice and they didn't shoot. He woke up and reached for it. That's when he shot

thats our job

It's a weapon of course they would feel threatened

So you're saying he reached for it before he woke up?

Lol

"He reached for it like twice and they didn't shoot. He woke up and reached for it. That's when he shot"

That's what it sounds like you're saying at least

He reached for it twice before he woke up and they didn't shoot. At this point I can call you retarded because I've stated that fact like 2 times now.

He reached for it twice before he woke up 🤔

He woke up and then reached for it and that's when they shot

GG @GeT_DuCkT, you just advanced to level 1!

Wow the guy whos asleep in his car is going to shoot you

Sounds very threatening there

Yes. He did movements towards the gun 2 times before he was awake

IF HE'S ASLEEP HE'S NOT THREATENING YOU JESUS

Are my messages going right over your head?

What the fuck is your logic

No I can read them

They saw him wake up and reach for it when he saw them that's when they shot

GG @America_Chan, you just advanced to level 1!

1. He did movements towards the gun before he was "awake"

2. He woke up and reached for the gun

3. The officers shot

The thing is if you watch the video that I say you can clearly hear one of the officers saying that he wanted to shoot the guy if he woke up, making no mention of if he reaches for the gun

Oh now you're talking shit

No I'm not

No they said if he made a move for the gun they would put him down

I think I might have seen diff bodycam footage from you cos it looked like it was a diff perspective from that vid you sent