@Uninteresting [X] Doubt

The first books of the Old Testament, Genesis through Deuteronomy, make up the Torah, which is the central Jewish scripture.

@Uninteresting Anything that proves your point.

@Chaiske You got anything to prove that?

dude youre being ignorant on purpose, you wanna get spoonfed info instead of actually doing research

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-torah/

@Uninteresting And you're dodging actually proving it in favor of accusing me of being ignorant.

The Torah and the Bible
The Torah, Prophets (Nevi’im) and the Writings (Ketuvim) collectively make up The Hebrew Bible (what Christians refer to as the Old Testament). The Bible is often referred to by the Hebrew acronym TaNaKh (usually spelled Tanakh, or Tanach )

@Deleted User alrighty then

disproving baseless claims

here we go bois

will you accept wikipedia or is that not reliable enough for you

because of "da joos" or w/e

@Chaiske >Myjewishlearning
I sure trust a rabbi on this.

http://catholic-resources.org/Bible/Heb-Xn-Bibles.htm

its not necessarily a rabbi

https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/hebrew-bible

could simply be someone who is knowledgable in the subject

@Chaiske Who is this guy and why should I trust him?>

It's a resource on Catholic learning, and the Catholic church is the largest Christian denomination in the world?

@Chaiske Yes, because the catholics certainly haven't been wittled down over time.

Do you have any proof of that?

You're constantly doubting me and all my proof without actually showing any evidence to weigh your arguments on your end.

I'm sorry, but at this point it seems to me like you're committed in your opinion.

Any further argument at this point is really just going to be a debacle in sophistry.

https://bibleask.org/does-jesus-appear-in-the-old-testament/

I'll be the first to throw my towel in and consider this conversation ended.

You may call yourself the winner if you'd like, if you have such petty sentiments, not that I am assuming you do.

Regardless, thank you for your time.

heres something about the only appearance of christ in the old testament

but fr dude

whats the point of debating if you only debate in bad faith

@Chaiske Well if you want to do that then.

@Uninteresting This literally states how he appeared in the bible, are you blind?

but anyway the website basically makes the claim that jesus never actually appeared "in the flesh"

@Deleted User read the entire thing

theyre all interpretations of christ

@Uninteresting 6-In Josh. 5:13-15, it speaks of how Christ appeared to Joshua. Joshua was near Jericho when he saw a man with a sword drawn. Immediately Joshua wanted to know if he was friend or foe and he was told by the man that he was captain of the Lord’s host. Upon hearing this, Joshua fell on his face and worshiped him. This man did not stop Joshua from worshiping Him as any other servant of the Lord would do (Acts 10:26; 14:15; Rev. 19:10; 22:9 where servants of God stopped other men from worshiping them). Joshua asked Jesus what His message was and Jesus responded by telling Joshua to take off his shoes because he was on holy ground, which is the same thing he told Moses in Exodus when He appeared to him in a burning bush.

Read the fucking articles before you post them.

from a quick google search of the actual quote in question

jesus was never once mentionned

He sure as hell was mentioned right in that quote from the bible.

13 Now when Joshua was near Jericho, he looked up and saw a man standing in front of him with a drawn sword in his hand. Joshua went up to him and asked, “Are you for us or for our enemies?”

14 “Neither,” he replied, “but as commander of the army of the Lord I have now come.” Then Joshua fell facedown to the ground in reverence, and asked him, “What message does my Lord[a] have for his servant?”

15 The commander of the Lord’s army replied, “Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy.” And Joshua did so.

do you see jesus in there?

"Joshua asked Jesus what His message was and Jesus responded by telling Joshua to take off his shoes because he was on holy ground"

im giving you the actual quote from the bible

And I am giving you the quote as well.

thats from an inherently biased website article

So a team of holy men are biased?

How?

because theyre looking for anything to spread their religion my dude

Oh please, you run off of assumptions.

what?

this entire argument has been run off of assumptions my dude

if you read that article to its full degree they make multiple assumptions as well

You sure as right with that, all you have made is assumptions.

good baseless claim but k

im going to spell it out here since i dont think youre getting it

and thisll be my last bit before i go since this feels like a waste of time

An assured thing.

bibleask.org is a source for christians to ask for questions concerning the bible

from a group of incredibly committed christians

And how are they biased?

Is a christian not allowed to make questions about the bible?

thats not the point

just hold on

the people publishing these answers, especially the original posted article, havent actually posted any kind of concrete evidence just interpretations

guided by their faith

in each of those passages

And what isn't more concrete in their faith than the bible?

you can see that it only referes to the LORD or to some kind of divinity

this is going over your head isnt it

they never refer to jesus in name

And christ is another word for jesus, don't you know? Jesus was often referred to as christ.

they never use the word christ either

Doubt besieges me.

you can doubt whatever you want

we've posted the evidence

the info is out there

if thats still not enough then w/e

And your claims that my source isn't valid are poor at best.

what source?

you havent posted anything at all m8

Nope, instead I just used the source that you posted as evidence against you.

oh the article?

dude you can search up every single one of those bible passages

not a single one of them mentions jesus or christ

Yet is a holy mans interpretation not valid?

the article is making an interpretation of the passages

first off, we have absolutely no evidence that its a priest writting this (whatever you mean by that)

Yet is a holy mans interpretation somehow negligible?

in terms of historical factors such as this, they are yes

because they are too involved with the source matter to give a reliably objective analysis

or do i need to explain that to you too?

So a persons entire lifes work in studying a religious text is negigible>

not necessarily, but in this case yes because he has ulterior motives that drift away from just getting the facts

And what are those?

due to the nature of his position

How so?

wanting to validate his religion?

do i have to explain everything to you>?

And what is wrong with validating his religion? Would you prefer his invalidates his own religion?

nothing, it just doesnt make him the best source for these sorts of things because he has personal connections to them that can influence the objective writing

anyway im done for real pce

Sure.....

Répandez-le aussi loin que vous le pouvez! NOUS N'AVONS PAS BEAUCOUP DE TEMPS AVANT QUE LE PARLEMENT EUROPEEN NE LE VOIT (20 JUIN)!

Bienvenue à SOPA 2.0 édition européenne, et ne pense pas que cela ne nous affectera pas si nous n'aidons pas nos frères européens, ce sera pire car nous aurions besoin d'une licence européenne pour beaucoup de choses qui sont des liens

pourrait être un bon usage pour armer les Tumblr-ites comme ils perdraient et ont leurs propres plates-formes disparaissent sans aucune notion ou raison si elle passe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvXOfq3AB8s

heh

sucks to be eu

Spread this meme

Hello everyone I'm Mike "Turning Transgenders into Transistors" Pence

Or if you rather Mike "Putting the Trans in transistors" Pence

@hyperFUKBOT oh boy they're just asking for it

I'm spreading that

^^^

peak centrism

im an national vanguardist makhnovist that belives all jews should die

I'm a national-trotskyist-egoist-anarcho-pacifist

woa

lmao

with juche characteristics

also fyi nazmakh is no joke

why doesn't this surprise me

i mean, ireland isnt going to unite itself

were to overrun with brit zionists

anti-anglo nazmakh?

irish national anarchism

as in Gaelige NazMakh gang

simply im just an irish nationalist and an ancom

being nationalist without a state
still not as bad as ancap

well

anything is better than ancap

s000000000000

yea

nation without state>nation over state

although i was a pure egoist a while ago

you must've been insufferable

not really

i mean i wasn't hateful towards other leftists.
i wasn't a classical egoist

what the fuck

nazbol gang

thats from a guy in atomwafffen

of course

hei

have you read

*siege?*

reed seej

i haev joo

lessen die spook buch

atomwaffle

waffleboos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXkndth5tGk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfzPYVHUib8

gte it? the funny xa xa

you got me

@Erika.ϟϟ🇮🇪 Edgy.

*says the man with an avatar that says nothing but "KILL YOU"*

@DA GOMMIE JOO ikr

@DA GOMMIE JOO You got me there.

r/yesiamverysmart

is this the main /leftypol/ on discord?

eh

still worth it

maybe there's a better alternative than child sex dolls

just saying

what's fake cp

is it like real cp but somehow isn't

wgat

Loli hentai?

so not child sex dolls

but animated children enjoying sex with adults, because that is somehow also okay

also, just a thought, but advocating for child porn to arrest people and have a documented system to cover this might be a political thought. But that's just me my dude

well if its between child porn and child rape, then yeah, but there's probably better alternatives

than giving people access to child porn

also I'd say whether or not you're against child porn, or advocate child porn, is a pretty big stance on politics

@Zircuits Just so you know E is a jew too.

I knew English suck my dick

I heard someone say Jew?

no

`Just so you know E is a jew too.`

I knew it!

You've all become infected by the Jewish plague

<:troll:312064734113431553>

Everyone is a Jew here

Oh no

Anti-semitism isn’t good

h

Hah

Communism is anti-semitic, it was created by a self hating Jew.

They taught anti-Semitism in Russian schools

what do I get if I reverse image search this

oof

the nazis were very communist obviously

The protocols were written in Tsarist Russia by Znamya

they were plagiarized from a french play about napoleon III

Where did u hear that?

hang on

once my shitty internet loads

The protocols were written by Russian Nationalists, not communists

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/a-hoax-of-hate
1921 jewish book

It's original text was from 1903

There were edits

It's full version was from 1905

the original text was from 1864 and was taken from "Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu"

http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/marcuse/classes/33d/projects/protzion/DelaCruzProtocolsMain.htm
here's a .edu source

it was basically a copy and paste job

I don't see it.

Ohhh yeah

Now I do further down

one of those literally has a red star on it

OH BOY

another nazi picture

Ok i'll get you one from Russia

In the meantime read this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_the_Soviet_Union

https://www.ozy.com/true-story/from-russia-with-anti-semitism/37760

I'm looking for one where there's this giant metal Jew spider and web with a star of david hat on structure in a Russian elementary school.

They were all anti-semitic

Stalin hated jews

And supported israel

In a stunning turn of events

Because it was founded off of the many kibbutzes

@Général Charles de Gaulle Stalin married a jew and had jew children, he also had a jewish cabinent.

He had one jew in his cabinet who had never been remotely religious

He had his wife murdered, btw

The only measures that the USSR made against jews was the religion, which all religion was outlawed, so I don't see how that makes them specificly anti semetic.

@Deleted User stalin called the jews filthy parasites

@Général Charles de Gaulle False, the jews are not just religious, it also a race, as well as that, his wife died from tuberculosis, not an assassination.

@Général Charles de Gaulle The religious jews that is.

As we as that, he head of propaganda, NKVD, and various other party members were jews as well.

Judaism is an ethnic group, not a race

Incorrect. Many were purged

@Général Charles de Gaulle Wrong, it is genetically destinct enough to be labeled as a race, why do you think the US refers to them officially as a race?

And Stalin whispered to Roosevelt at Yalta that the jews were filthy parasites

@Général Charles de Gaulle I am sure he did.

@Général Charles de Gaulle Oh, you mean the headsman of the purges, who was racially jewish?